We should stay away from Bradford

If none of you want to discuss this then don't come in this thread. It's not like you're being forced to discuss it. I don't come here very often so I don't know what has discussed. My point was Bradford is to much of a risk to draft him 4th overall. He hasn't thrown a pass in months. In 2008 he was without a doubt a great qb. He was extremely accurate with the football. However, he has missed practically a whole season of football. He didn't participate in the combine. He has yet to throw a pass to prove that he's physcially capable. The scouts can say whatever they want about his abilities there are just to many unanswered questions to take a chance on this guy. We cannot afford to miss with that 4th pick.

And our point was the fact that none of this was new information. Now if you had something like a quote from a coach or new interesting analysis from a scout then that would be interesting but this is just basic stuff and your title is leading to boot.

If none of you want to discuss this then don't come in this thread. It's not like you're being forced to discuss it. I don't come here very often so I don't know what has discussed. My point was Bradford is to much of a risk to draft him 4th overall. He hasn't thrown a pass in months. In 2008 he was without a doubt a great qb. He was extremely accurate with the football. However, he has missed practically a whole season of football. He didn't participate in the combine. He has yet to throw a pass to prove that he's physcially capable. The scouts can say whatever they want about his abilities there are just to many unanswered questions to take a chance on this guy. We cannot afford to miss with that 4th pick.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse. It's not hard to see what's been discussed. Just do a search for "Bradford" and you would find (at minimum) this:

http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/35374-schefter-theres-no-way-rams-wont.html?

http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/35552-bradford-won-t-oklahoma-s-pro.html?

http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/35456-nfl-95-mock-munch-bradford-takes.html?

http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/35215-malcolm-kelly-gives-his-thoughts-sam.html?

http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/34870-79-mock-drafts-sam-bradford-still.html?

Don't want to do that? When you start a thread you could type in "Bradford" in the title and then click on "check if already posted" right next to it.

As for Bradford himself

1) I'm pretty sure his shoulder injury wasn't nearly as bad as Drew Brees'
2) He has thrown plenty of passes, just hasn't done it for the general public

I'll leave this open for now (not really even sure why) but I don't doubt it will be locked soon enough

I'll leave this open for now (not really even sure why) but I don't doubt it will be locked soon enough

ACLU rearing it's ugly head again.

And our point was the fact that none of this was new information. Now if you had something like a quote from a coach or new interesting analysis from a scout then that would be interesting but this is just basic stuff and your title is leading to boot.

I never implied that this was new information. You just have a lot of Skins fans pushing to draft this guy and I can't understand why.

Please lock!

Ignorance of the law is no excuse. It's not hard to see what's been discussed. Just do a search for "Bradford" and you would find (at minimum) this:

http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/35374-schefter-theres-no-way-rams-wont.html?

http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/35552-bradford-won-t-oklahoma-s-pro.html?

http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/35456-nfl-95-mock-munch-bradford-takes.html?

http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/35215-malcolm-kelly-gives-his-thoughts-sam.html?

http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/34870-79-mock-drafts-sam-bradford-still.html?

Don't want to do that? When you start a thread you could type in "Bradford" in the title and then click on "check if already posted" right next to it.

As for Bradford himself

1) I'm pretty sure his shoulder injury wasn't nearly as bad as Drew Brees'
2) He has thrown plenty of passes, just hasn't done it for the general public

I'll leave this open for now (not really even sure why) but I don't doubt it will be locked soon enough

There is no reason to be rude. I don't know what's wrong with you guys but many of you aren't showing a lot of class right now. If you guys don't want to discuss this with me then do what's in your heart and not ignore the thread. If you disagree with me then can sumbit your opinion respectfully. There is absolutely no reason to rude to fellow Skins fan that wants to best for the team just like you do.

#1- Bradford has proven to be the most accurate of all the QB's.
#2- Yes his injury is a concern, but his doctor works for or with the Skins. :)
#3- We already have had several QB's in the past that had good arms, just not accurate:

Ramsey
Brunell (technically prior to coming to the Skins)
Campbell
Collins

So we don't need simply a strong armed QB, we need an accurate passer. It has been pointed out that the next most accurate passer would be McCoy who's arm is weaker then Bradfords.

#4- Can we start a thread "Why we don't need Okung"?

I keep hearing how he's too big and possibly slow for Shanahan's scheme.

I'd be for that if they can manage to trade down and still get a good OT that fits the scheme.

You guys are acting like a group of bitches on their period. If this thread such a waste of your time then simple ignore it. That would make more sense.

This guy has missed practically a whole season of football. He got a serious shoulder injury that I believe is more serious than first advertised. He has yet to prove that he still got it. I just think he's to much of a risk to draft him at 4th overall. I know we need a franchise qb. But is Bradford a franchise qb? I honestly do not see it.

Describe what you consider a franchise QB.

Please lock!

I'm sure this is blasphemy for Bradford boners.