Warpath Mock Draft - Start Time 3/15, 8am

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57

BigHairedAristocrat
03-16-2010, 12:13 PM
Spiller was hard to pass on. Although Brown is a slight reach (see Sam Baker), OT was a position of great need for the Skins. The Skins also have the 49th pick in this mock and there should be a solid RB available at that pick who would not be a tremendous drop-off from Spiller. The drop-off at OT after Brown was much more dramatic.

so which of the two OTs you picked will be playing QB for us? ;)

diehardskin2982
03-16-2010, 12:15 PM
D'Boyz: so what I douched the pick! In reality this year more than any year there will be trades of players, while in this mock we cannot trade players. If the skins and the 49ers were to make that trade it would probrally include a well thought of player in addition to the picks.

CRedskinsRule
03-16-2010, 12:27 PM
Jason_Lame_Canthearya

Steelers FO may accidentally have been on same plane as Chicago FO. Reportedly Steelers FO will be back in time for their selection.

19 min ago via whytweetthis

D'BOYZ
03-16-2010, 12:28 PM
D'Boyz: so what I douched the pick! In reality this year more than any year there will be trades of players, while in this mock we cannot trade players. If the skins and the 49ers were to make that trade it would probrally include a well thought of player in addition to the picks.

Which Redskins player do you believe SF need or would take that would make them trade up in the draft? specially in one of the best draft classes according to "experts" in decades... change scenarios for a second imagine SF has the 4th pick and Washington has the 13 and 17 of the draft do u see Washington trading both their high first round picks to move up and get a safety? and what player would u realisticly take from SF to add in that trade... please don't say Crabtree, Davis, Gore or Davis because we all know SF wouldn't trade those 4 players.

Now if your trade had included Washigntons 2nd round pick I think it would had been more realistic but again not for a safety I just think you wanted to help Snyder a little lol and see your team have a fantasitc draft.

I don't see any player Washington has that they would be willing to trade worth those two picks. Maybe Campbell if SF thought it would be their QB for the future but that would mean Was would need to draft a QB in the first round.

53Fan
03-16-2010, 12:32 PM
Jason_Lame_Canthearya

Steelers FO may accidentally have been on same plane as Chicago FO. Reportedly Steelers FO will be back in time for their selection.

19 min ago via whytweetthis

It's no accident. They're working on a Cutler for Roethlisberger trade.

CRedskinsRule
03-16-2010, 12:32 PM
Which Redskins player do you believe SF need or would take that would make them trade up in the draft? specially in one of the best draft classes according to "experts" in decades... change scenarios for a second imagine SF has the 4th pick and Washington has the 13 and 17 of the draft do u see Washington trading both their high first round picks to move up and get a safety? and what player would u realisticly take from SF to add in that trade... please don't say Crabtree, Davis, Gore or Davis because we all know SF wouldn't trade those 4 players.

Now if your trade had included Washigntons 2nd round pick I think it would had been more realistic but again not for a safety I just think you wanted to help Snyder a little lol and see your team have a fantasitc draft.

I don't see any player Washington has that they would be willing to trade worth those two picks. Maybe Campbell if SF thought it would be their QB for the future but that would mean Was would need to draft a QB in the first round.

Trade details:
Washington receives SF picks 13, 17, and 49 in exchange for their picks 4 and 37.

By the trade value chart:
Skins picks(4, 37) = 2330
SF (13, 17, 49) = 2510
The draft numbers worked out slightly to SF favor, but I think you throw Carter in, and let him go back to SF and I think this would be a deal that could get done.

diehardskin2982
03-16-2010, 12:36 PM
It did include the 2nd rounder...

Lets say they moved up on a trade with the skins for JC plus the first. That solves the qb issue, SF could take that first and draft Okung. However if they did an analysis and felt that Berry is the type of talent that many are saying A-la Ed Reed type of talent then I would say yeah, take him- why? because he would solidfy my secondary for years to come.

CRedskinsRule
03-16-2010, 12:39 PM
It did include the 2nd rounder...

Lets say they moved up on a trade with the skins for JC plus the first. That solves the qb issue, I would take that first and pick Okung. However if I did an analysis and felt that Berry is the type of talent that many are saying A-la Ed Reed type of talent then I would say yeah I take him- why because he would solidfy my secondary for years to come.

Well, I don't think JC gets thrown in that deal because we would definitely be drafting a project qb, but SF has a need at DE, and would take Carter in a heartbeat.

D'BOYZ
03-16-2010, 12:42 PM
Trade details:
Washington receives SF picks 13, 17, and 49 in exchange for their picks 4 and 37.

By the trade value chart:
Skins picks(4, 37) = 2330
SF (13, 17, 49) = 2510
The draft numbers worked out slightly to SF favor, but I think you throw Carter in, and let him go back to SF and I think this would be a deal that could get done.


My point was Washington recieves 13, and 17 .... SF gets 4 and 37 and don't give their 49 pick... Again that move doesn't make a lot of sense for a Safety when SF has huge needs.

diehardskin2982
03-16-2010, 12:42 PM
A deal could be worked out

Your scenario DBoyz is not even part of the scenario that was played in this mock draft! SF's 3rd rounder was part of the mock scenario.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum