Updated: Redskins Make Major Roster Cuts

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

GTripp0012
03-04-2010, 10:29 PM
Are pro-bowlers good?In this specific case, no.

I think Quinn is more comparable to what you already have in Campbell, but I still think that's a small downgrade. However, what you're giving up in production, you're gaining in age. Which is not the case with Anderson.

Ruhskins
03-04-2010, 10:29 PM
Be..cause.. we can pick up Pashos in FA to fill the LT spot and maybe pick up a FA RT or look to pick up a RT in the draft say the 2nd round after we pick up Bradford. ;)

Yeah, FA and RT spells FART, and that's what we'll get if we patch the line with old farts.

GusFrerotte
03-04-2010, 10:30 PM
Well Rogers is the best player in the trade, Anderson has accomplished a ton more than Campbell ever has and like you said, the jury is still out on Quinn. I would rather have Okung/Davis and either Quinn/Anderson then Bradford and a second round pick.



Always take the pick, especially with the bunch of guys you are talking about. Anderson is better than Quinn, but that is not saying too much. Do you take Anderson/ Quinn or get an extra pick where you could draft a QB. If the pick is for this draft we could draft another QB with it. Only QBs slated to be taken by the second round are the "fab" 4 and maybe Brown from WVa. We could land Bradford/Clausen and Lefevour/Stull/Hall/etc. I rather use our first two picks for linemen, but just saying I rather draft an extra QB in a QB deep draft than get Anderson.

SmootSmack
03-04-2010, 10:30 PM
Does he have insider access? We tendered JC so whoever takes him is going to give up a first round pick. I find that hard to believe, even if it is a future first rounder.

That's not necessarily true. The other team doesn't have to give up a first rounder if the Redskins and the other team can agree on other compensation

The Goat
03-04-2010, 10:31 PM
Yeah, FA and RT spells FART, and that's what we'll get if we patch the line with old farts.

:laughing2

WaldSkins
03-04-2010, 10:31 PM
Can't tell you. Also, not saying they will. Just that they'd like to

Wouldn't we all

artmonkforhallofamein07
03-04-2010, 10:32 PM
Being that Cleveland is terrible, I don't really think we want any of thier QBs here.

All we need is a few more losers on the team to turn it around.

SBXVII
03-04-2010, 10:32 PM
Yeah, FA and RT spells FART, and that's what we'll get if we patch the line with old farts.

Your a good speller. I don't think Pashos is an old fart and I too am glad we are getting rid of dead wood. Bring Pashos on as LT and pick up a QB in the 1st round. Hopefully we get another 1st round pick to get an OL or just take them in the second round.

SmootSmack
03-04-2010, 10:32 PM
Pretty sure Derek Anderson will be flat out released soon. And if I remember right, I think I heard he could be heading to the Cardinals?

Ruhskins
03-04-2010, 10:32 PM
Are pro-bowlers good?

Anderson's Pro Bowl as a long time ago (or that's what it seems). He f'ing sucks. Just because you don't like Campbell, it doesn't mean that you have to come up with this Anderson BS. In one game last season, Anderson had TWO completions! In this league it is all about what you have done to me lately. Right now, you could trade Campbell for a pick (maybe a mid round pick), you couldn't get a ham sandwich and a coke for Anderson. Give me a break.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum