|
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
[ 8]
budw38 03-08-2010, 03:45 PM Besides teaching my dogs how to sit, come, walk on a leash, and a few other things I have never had to teach them how not to attack people. I guess that's what has to be done if you own a dangerous dog. I'm thinking if I have to teach a dog not to attack then its probably not a good idea for a family pet.
Just find an old stuffed animal , put it in a .... cowturd , iggle or giants jersey and tease the hell out of the dog/s .... and let us know what happens :)
firstdown 03-08-2010, 04:23 PM Just find an old stuffed animal , put it in a .... cowturd , iggle or giants jersey and tease the hell out of the dog/s .... and let us know what happens :)
What any dog or a rot/ pit.
wolfeskins 03-08-2010, 04:49 PM Ironically, the topic of Cesar Millan's latest episode spoke exclusively about dangerous dog myths. He highlighted three breeds - Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds. Check it out. The show airs on National Geographic Channel. The title is "Most Aggressive Breeds".
I found one of his closing quotes to be perfect for this thread...
"So next time you hear about a dog attack, please don't just blame the dog or its breed. Let's all make sure everyone understands why the dog became that way - because of the human in that dog's life."
in some cases, yes, the owner can be blamed but in 99% of dog attacks, the dog is to be blamed because of those 99%, 98% of them are pits or rotts. those dogs are just too aggressive and they can snap without warning. imo, it's a stupid idea to have a pit or rott if you have small children, why not just get a lion or an alligator.
firstdown 03-08-2010, 05:25 PM in some cases, yes, the owner can be blamed but in 99% of dog attacks, the dog is to be blamed because of those 99%, 98% of them are pits or rotts. those dogs are just too aggressive and they can snap without warning. imo, it's a stupid idea to have a pit or rott if you have small children, why not just get a lion or an alligator.
I don't think that Rots or Pits attack much more then the average dog its just the damage they do when they attack.
cpayne5 03-08-2010, 06:02 PM in some cases, yes, the owner can be blamed but in 99% of dog attacks, the dog is to be blamed because of those 99%, 98% of them are pits or rotts. those dogs are just too aggressive and they can snap without warning. imo, it's a stupid idea to have a pit or rott if you have small children, why not just get a lion or an alligator.
98% of dog attacks are Pits or Rotts? Really, you can't possibly believe that, can you? :doh:
It's stupid to assume that a Rottweiler or a Pit Bull can't be a great dog with your kids. It's also stupid to compare these dogs to a lion or an alligator.
Want to visit mine the next time you're in northern Virginia? If you like dogs at all, you'll leave with a different mindset. I guarantee it.
DynamiteRave 03-08-2010, 10:35 PM Besides teaching my dogs how to sit, come, walk on a leash, and a few other things I have never had to teach them how not to attack people. I guess that's what has to be done if you own a dangerous dog. I'm thinking if I have to teach a dog not to attack then its probably not a good idea for a family pet.
So dogs must be born naturally aggressive right? Just like humans are born inherently evil. :doh:
wolfeskins 03-09-2010, 07:11 AM 98% of dog attacks are Pits or Rotts? Really, you can't possibly believe that, can you? :doh:
It's stupid to assume that a Rottweiler or a Pit Bull can't be a great dog with your kids. It's also stupid to compare these dogs to a lion or an alligator.
Want to visit mine the next time you're in northern Virginia? If you like dogs at all, you'll leave with a different mindset. I guarantee it.
yea i was exagerating a bit,but every time i hear of a bad dog attack,it usually involves a pitt or rott.
i wouldn't mind visiting but i'm not bringing my kids.
|