Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread


SBXVII
03-07-2010, 12:33 AM
Except, of course, that we don't.

Non-tendered RFA = UFA.

Then perhaps someone should remind the Skins organization who still have him on their roster.

Meks
03-07-2010, 01:17 AM
I would honestly be OK with signing Willie Parker for a year or two. The guys got shit to prove IMO. .
Our tamdum would be sick

Pocket$ $traight
03-07-2010, 01:21 AM
I would honestly be OK with signing Willie Parker for a year or two. The guys got shit to prove IMO. .
Our tamdum would be sick

Is Fast Willie Parker still fast? If he isn't he should be Fast Willie Commentator.

Meks
03-07-2010, 02:06 AM
U know damn well he's still a good rb

Meks
03-07-2010, 02:06 AM
Parker and Portis ? Stop.

Lotus
03-07-2010, 02:15 AM
Is Fast Willie Parker still fast? If he isn't he should be Fast Willie Commentator.

I fear that he is not so fast any more but is not yet a commentator.

Pocket$ $traight
03-07-2010, 02:30 AM
Parker and Portis ? Stop.

Maybe if this was your 2005 fantasy backfield... If we sign him, he must have something left in the tank.

The Goat
03-07-2010, 03:44 AM
I think if we sign Willie Parker then Portis is gone. It's just a hunch on my part, but from the beginning I believed Shanny will draft a RB and have probably one other main carrier on the roster. Portis looked awful most of last season and then of course there's the concussion. With LT, Westbrook showing how quickly even great RBs hit their wall I think the FO looks to dump Portis soon.

tryfuhl
03-07-2010, 03:49 AM
I think if we sign Willie Parker then Portis is gone. It's just a hunch on my part, but from the beginning I believed Shanny will draft a RB and have probably one other main carrier on the roster. Portis looked awful most of last season and then of course there's the concussion. With LT, Westbrook showing how quickly even great RBs hit their wall I think the FO looks to dump Portis soon.

It's hard to say. Can you call either one of them the definitive starter? Probably not. I'd take Portis over Parker at this point, assuming clean bill of health from each. Don't know that we'll take an RB high enough to guarantee a start. We'll address the position but I don't think that we'll end up with THAT guy.

tootergray34
03-07-2010, 04:38 AM
totally agree fellas...Portis > Parker....two fold.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum