Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

Larry Johnson really? Wow. I wouldn't mind that. Dude can be a bit of a tool though.

Seemingly every hour since yesterday morning I've heard "Willie Parker is about to sign with the Redskins"

I've decided not to believe it anymore until/unless it actually happens

Larry Johnson really? Wow. I wouldn't mind that. Dude can be a bit of a tool though.

Seemingly every hour since yesterday morning I've heard "Willie Parker is about to sign with the Redskins"

I've decided not to believe it anymore until/unless it actually happens

I thought we should have jumped all over LJ immediately after the Chiefs released him.

And yes, I would rather have him over Fast Willie Parker.

I wouldn't be upset if we picked Bradford, but I think we should use the pick on an offensive lineman with our first pick.

I've been fairly critical of Jason Campbell. Not over the top, but some. Honestly I think this is the first time Campbell has played for a bonafide, competent coaching staff since he's been a Redskin. Even when Gibbs was here, the scheme evolved and was somewhat disjointed. The same under Zorn, which turned out to be an experiment. I'm hoping we'll see Campbell actually build on some of his successes from last year.

i agree with you 100%. If nothing else, Campbell is competent. If there were a sure-fire bonafide stud of a QB in this years draft, then i'd be on board with drafting Bradford. Unfortunately, there's not. This team needs alot of improvement from the QB position but it needs even more from the LT position. I simply cant understand any argument for drafting a player at a lesser need who has a 50/50 or greater probability of being a bust vs. drafting a can't miss LT prospect at the teams greatest position of need. I simply can't. hopefully, we won't be drafting this high again for a long, long time. lets not screw it up.

Campbell better hope he has a good o-line next year, because Green Bay, Minnesota, Indy, and Houston(Mario Williams vs. scrub LT if we don't draft one, anyone?) can all bring it and I wouldn't discount Tennessee either and don't even get started with the teams in the division, because it's common knowledge that they...can..kill...QBs.

I would take a chance on Brady, especially with Shanahan as our coach.

Sources: Cleveland Browns looking to trade Brady Quinn, add another quarterback - ESPN (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4982407)

Larry Johnson really? Wow. I wouldn't mind that. Dude can be a bit of a tool though.

Seemingly every hour since yesterday morning I've heard "Willie Parker is about to sign with the Redskins"

I've decided not to believe it anymore until/unless it actually happens

I'm with you SS. I live on ESPN Insider and all I hear is Parker and Antonio Bryant. Would you rahter have Parker or Johnson. In my opinion I want Parker. I just don't like Johnson's attitude personally.

Sam Bradford is Brilliant!!

Report: Sam Bradford scored 36 on Wonderlic - NFL- nbcsports.msnbc.com (http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/35799570/ns/sports-player_news/)

So now they're talking about Brady Quinn will be dealt soon - coming to D.C. maybe? Hmmm...

So now they're talking about Brady Quinn will be dealt soon - coming to D.C. maybe? Hmmm...

I have heard so many rumors it is ridiculous. Antonio Bryant, now Quinn, LJ, Paker etc.

Well I know I have (and I think others as well) talked about the fact that Shahanan will undoubtedly make one or two decisions this spring that will really make you scratch your head. That's what he does. He loves to take risks.

Maybe LJ is that guy. Talent wise I'll take him any day of the week over Willie Parker. If I'm looking for a team guy who will be a positive influence then I'll take Parker. Or...I wait until draft day, trade down, and get both talent and leadership with CJ Spiller! :)