Dirtbag59
02-26-2010, 12:08 AM
My bad, yeah they should take Bradford, makes sense for them.
Dun worry it's k
Dun worry it's k
Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1Dirtbag59 02-26-2010, 12:08 AM My bad, yeah they should take Bradford, makes sense for them. Dun worry it's k skinsfaninok 02-26-2010, 12:11 AM If the Rams take Bradford they would be like the the portland trailblazers pasing on Jordan for Sam Bowie. Then later pasing on Kevin Durant for Greg Oden. Suh is the closest player to Rev. White. This must be a smoke screen! You can't say that, Bradford is considered the best QB in the draft and has been for 2 years now.. Suh is a beast but who says he is going to be worth the number 1 pick? I remember when ppl thought Dan Wilkinson was worth the pick... GTripp0012 02-26-2010, 12:15 AM If Suh truly is the most dominant player in the draft, I think you take him. You can never have too many pass rushers.I don't think he's more dominant than, say, Haloti Ngata was, and Ngata made it out of the top ten. I think Suh might be the best player in the draft, but I wouldn't say I see him as the type of player teams will regret drafting for the next ten years. I think he's just going to develop into a pro bowl defensive tackle by 2013. skinsfaninok 02-26-2010, 12:18 AM I don't think he's more dominant than, say, Haloti Ngata was, and Ngata made it out of the top ten. I think Suh might be the best player in the draft, but I wouldn't say I see him as the type of player teams will regret drafting for the next ten years. I think he's just going to develop into a pro bowl defensive tackle by 2013. Lets be realistic, when your starting a franchise, what should you draft? QB OR DT? Let me think.... O yea QB. Hell we have the best DT in the league and you saw what it got us (4-12). Point is everything starts with a QB, yes even Oline. If you don't have a QB (Vikings before Favre), you won't be real successful. Ruhskins 02-26-2010, 12:25 AM Lets be realistic, when your starting a franchise, what should you draft? QB OR DT? Let me think.... O yea QB. Hell we have the best DT in the league and you saw what it got us (4-12). Point is everything starts with a QB, yes even Oline. If you don't have a QB (Vikings before Favre), you won't be real successful. I don't think Tripp was saying that we should draft Suh, merely stating that he is not as dominant as someone made him out to be. And your Vikings example is horrible. Minny had everything (elite defense, very good offensive line, good running game, and decent receivers), EXCEPT a QB to be successful. While Favre was the icing on the cake, one of the reasons they were successful, was because that offensive line kept Favre upright. We are far from being just a QB away from being successful. diehardskin2982 02-26-2010, 12:30 AM I disagree with you Inok because a team has a higher likelihood to hit than miss with a Dend like Suh. It's like when the Texans took Mario...time has proven that they made the right decision. As good as Bradford could be, he still would have no one if drafted by the Rams up front good enough to protect him; therefore he is likely to run the risk of reinjuring the shoulder. skinsfaninok 02-26-2010, 12:32 AM I don't think Tripp was saying that we should draft Suh, merely stating that he is not as dominant as someone made him out to be. And your Vikings example is horrible. Minny had everything (elite defense, very good offensive line, good running game, and decent receivers), EXCEPT a QB to be successful. While Favre was the icing on the cake, one of the reasons they were successful, was because that offensive line kept Favre upright. We are far from being just a QB away from being successful. I agree about us, but we need a QB anyway.. As far as Minny, I'll go with Dallas as another example. Before Romo where were they? Avg or below avg. Same goes with New Orleans before Brees. skinsfaninok 02-26-2010, 12:33 AM I disagree with you Inok because a team has a higher likelihood to hit than miss with a Dend like Suh. It's like when the Texans took Mario...time has proven that they made the right decision. As good as Bradford could be, he still would have no one if drafted by the Rams up front good enough to protect him; therefore he is likely to run the risk of reinjuring the shoulder. I can't argue about Suh he is amazing, but Bradford could become an elite QB within 2-3 years. Like Brees did in SD DIE-NASTY 02-26-2010, 12:35 AM Schefter and his crew of analysts are speculators. they're paid by espn to speculate. Essentially that's what passes for news these days. They need daily updates and the bigger the better. Why not? Bradford is going 1st overall! diehardskin2982 02-26-2010, 12:39 AM I don't think he's more dominant than, say, Haloti Ngata was, and Ngata made it out of the top ten. I think Suh might be the best player in the draft, but I wouldn't say I see him as the type of player teams will regret drafting for the next ten years. I think he's just going to develop into a pro bowl defensive tackle by 2013. Suh, I believe is way more talented than Ngata. Suh is equally talented as a pass rushing end as well as run stopper. the guy will be an instant force for which ever team he plays for. Can you imagine how much better Chris Long would be with Suh on the other side in a spags defense... Pretty scary |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum