ESPN: Clayton Expects Skins to Tender Campbell for a 1st and 3rd

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

mredskins
02-17-2010, 11:54 AM
Here we go again with the candle crap...do you realize NO ONE is going to take anything you say seriously with that immaturity? (not that your points are valid and unbiased anyways)


I do believe we should draft a Tackle with that #4 pick. Even if we get Bradford or Claussen, they won't be able to develop without a solid line. Think David Carr.

We won't get a 1st and 3rd for Campbell from anyone, so even speculating about a trade like this is pointless. Our best bet for success is to build up the line and let Campbell run Shanny's offense, which is tailor-made for his skillset. Shanahan's offense is run-heavy but the QB's role is made easy for a mobile QB to succeed. He likes to use half of the field and roll out the QB a lot. When tjhe QB rolls out, he'll have 3 routes being run at different depths right in front of him...so the progressions are as easy as counting 1-2-3 as the QB looks at all open options right in front of him. If no one is immediately open, the QB can take off, something that Campbell does better than most QBs in the league. He just needs to learn how to slide!

I think JC will be highly successful in this offense IF we have an offensive line and running game, which could come with the rebuilding of the line. With out first two picks at least, we need a Tackle and a Center/Guard. Rabach is backup material and cost us far too many points and possessions. After that, draft a RB and LB. If LeFevour is around in rounds 4-6, get him to groom as the #2 QB and to compete with Colt Brennan, who may not even make the team if we get someone like LeFevour. Late picks, get more depth at OL, LB and maybe even a CB with last-round potential. No more "best available" picks...we have specific and vital needs this year that Vinny and his crew ignored for years.


What is with the Candle thing? Is it a misspelling, igronance, a joke???

tryfuhl
02-17-2010, 11:55 AM
I doubt Jason has any trade value. The tender is irrelevant so they might as well make it for a trillion $ and a toilet made of solid gold. He'll either be cut if Shanny & Co find a true starter or he'll just compete for a spot on the team.

Realistically he's a Redskin for another year; however, it's not realistic to expect him to start all season. When Jason gets out of rhythm he's totally ineffective, struggling even to complete the basic stuff. Shanny will bench him in a heartbeat.

The more I think about Jason's future it's actually easy to see him out of the league not too long from now. One thing we know is he thinks he's far better than he really is...always asserting he is unquestionably a starter in this league. We also know most, if not all, franchises do not see him as a starter. If he's unwilling to meet his likely destiny on the bench somewhere I can see him just calling it good.
As much bad rep as he gets for not being vocal.. if he said "we'll have to see if the coaches think that I'm an NFL starter" that would be career suicide

hail_2_da_skins
02-17-2010, 11:56 AM
His name is Jason Campbell, not Candle. How can you call yourself a Redskin fan with this kind of crap. I used to call Tony Romo, Homo. Romo is a Cowboy, so its understandable. Out of respect for some of my Cowboy friends, I stop doing it. It's disrespectful. It doesn't matter if you like the guy or not, its wrong. Stop it.

tryfuhl
02-17-2010, 11:56 AM
1: You haven't seen the 08-09 Jason Candle have you?.

2: It doesn't mean we want to keep him it means we are shopping to see what we can get for him. Honestly this is 70% chance Candle will not be back.

3: You would let Jason Candle come back and end up leaving than to get a 4th round pick which could help us pick up a Tackle or G or what ever?.

4: It wouldn't mean nothing we will regardless get a QB with more picks.


I mean I'm still shocked your saying we aren't better off with him. Do you believe Joe Montana-Steve Young- Bret Favre wouldnt give us a better record than 4-12?
sooooooo

how long is your ban over at ES? I'm sure that they miss your insight

tryfuhl
02-17-2010, 11:57 AM
He's AVG............and come on...did you see his pick 6 against the Giants game?. How does he mis-throw a pass for a pick 6???does any body else make an mistake like that?.
YouTube - Jason Candle (Jason Campbell) Geico Commercial (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dd8SKfMj378)


^^^Candle. And its 70% chance because.

1: Bills-Rams-Vikes-Cards-Jags-Oak- all could use a QB who thinls can be good so look for one of them to atleast offer a 3rd.

2: If we go Bradford look for Campbell to not come back.

70% in my view. 0% unless Candle thinks he can perform for us as just a back up than yea sure.
So "Jason Candle" is the first player to throw a pick 6, it's in the books

MTK
02-17-2010, 12:00 PM
What is with the Candle thing? Is it a misspelling, igronance, a joke???

It's just dumb, not even funny

mredskins
02-17-2010, 12:01 PM
What is with the Candle thing? Is it a misspelling, igronance, a joke???


Ok I get it the GEICO commercial. Hilarity ensues, not.

Monkeydad
02-17-2010, 12:03 PM
All of this discussion will be moot when the Rams take Bradford at #1 anyways. :)

Monkeydad
02-17-2010, 12:04 PM
What is with the Candle thing? Is it a misspelling, igronance, a joke???

Ignorance with a side of stupidity.

redskins202
02-17-2010, 12:06 PM
I think you are exaggerating on Campbell's abilities, especially when you see analysts say thing like this...

NFL: The Carolina Panthers have depth problems at wide receiver - ESPN (http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insider/news/story?id=4911628)

Thats an ESPN writer writing that lol. Listen to the other NFL analysts who commented Campbell all game long. Did you hear Chris Collinsworth all game about Campbell on the Cowboys game? he thought Campbell wasn't a starter in his own words.


Its ok tho as long as we draft a QB for the future .

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum