pro life ad's in georgia

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7

firstdown
02-12-2010, 09:35 AM
You have said you are for a one payer health care system and that will not give us a choice so it seems you pick and choose the right of choice.

Saden I guess you don't want to reply to this because your choice thing does not hold water.

saden1
02-12-2010, 09:59 AM
Saden I guess you don't want to reply to this because your choice thing does not hold water.

I choose single payer for selfish reasons...I believe it saves me money in the long run..I'm worried about my bottom dollar...some skank aborting her baby doesnt impact my pocket.

firstdown
02-12-2010, 10:30 AM
I choose single payer for selfish reasons...I believe it saves me money in the long run..I'm worried about my bottom dollar...some skank aborting her baby doesnt impact my pocket.

So when its all said and done you only believe in choice when in benifits you.

CRedskinsRule
02-12-2010, 10:32 AM
I choose single payer for selfish reasons...I believe it saves me money in the long run..I'm worried about my bottom dollar...some skank aborting her baby doesnt impact my pocket.

It's interesting that you care so little about a baby whose birth is foreseeable in the short term - less than 9 months. But when the discussion on the end of the world was going on, you stated that the death of those in the far distant future should be a frightening prospect to us now.

But the skank who has an abortion, and the baby that would have been, don't get that same heart ache response.
http://www.thewarpath.net/parking-lot/29563-life-after-people-history-channel-3.html#post553394
Suppose I tell you that 90% of Americans will die of a mutated swine flu a month from now. Would this new found knowledge frighten you? My hearth aches at the thought and I can't help it. This is a normal and expected reaction. Indifference which is essential your position is not acceptable. If we all die off tomorrow, a month, a year, millions of years, or billions of years from now it's all the same. The grim demise of mankind and even the universe at large should be a frighting prospect irrespective of timetable or and lack of control.
...
Almost 1 million babies a year are not born due to abortions, granted that's not 90%, but the abortion to live birth ratio, as of 2001, was 246 abortions for every 1000 live births, us_abortion_statistics (http://www.abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics), certainly not a number to be discounted.

I googled, and used those statistics, looks like a pro-life site, so they are probably skewed high, but the point is valid if the number is ballparked

Trample the Elderly
02-12-2010, 10:57 AM
It's interesting that you care so little about a baby whose birth is foreseeable in the short term - less than 9 months. But when the discussion on the end of the world was going on, you stated that the death of those in the far distant future should be a frightening prospect to us now.

But the skank who has an abortion, and the baby that would have been, don't get that same heart ache response.
http://www.thewarpath.net/parking-lot/29563-life-after-people-history-channel-3.html#post553394

Almost 1 million babies a year are not born due to abortions, granted that's not 90%, but the abortion to live birth ratio, as of 2001, was 246 abortions for every 1000 live births, us_abortion_statistics (http://www.abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics), certainly not a number to be discounted.

I googled, and used those statistics, looks like a pro-life site, so they are probably skewed high, but the point is valid if the number is ballparked

Don't bother. He thinks he's better than everyone else.

CRedskinsRule
02-12-2010, 11:18 AM
Don't bother. He thinks he's better than everyone else.

I know but the stark contrast was interesting to me.

Monkeydad
02-12-2010, 04:35 PM
saw this on the news this morning and i think it is wrong on so many levels. i don't understand how these were even allowed, i would be outraged if they were in my town. i don't see how anyone in their right mind could think these ad's were done tastefully, there are much better ways to go about the pro-life, pro-choice debate. i thought the commercial during the super bowl was done with a lot more class and respect than these things.

Anti-Abortion Billboards on Race Split Opinion in Atlanta - NYTimes.com (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/06/us/06abortion.html)

for the record i am pro-abortion

Like in the Campbell thread, the stats don't lie. It's a tragedy that we can't talk about because of the PC-Police, but it could be helped with some education about it. Like it or not, there are some severe family issues in the black community. Abortions ARE sky high. So is the percentage of fatherless kids who are allowed to live. The welfare budgets do go primarily to urban areas too, where the crime rates are rising due to..guess what, the breakdown of the nuclear family with both a father and mother.

tryfuhl
02-13-2010, 12:21 AM
I think that they say 72pct of black kids are born out of wedlock; I don't think that marriage is absolutely necessary to display commitment or have children, but it's a telling statistic overall compared to whites at 28pct and latinas are a bit high at 51pct as well.

saden1
02-16-2010, 02:53 PM
It's interesting that you care so little about a baby whose birth is foreseeable in the short term - less than 9 months. But when the discussion on the end of the world was going on, you stated that the death of those in the far distant future should be a frightening prospect to us now.

But the skank who has an abortion, and the baby that would have been, don't get that same heart ache response.
http://www.thewarpath.net/parking-lot/29563-life-after-people-history-channel-3.html#post553394

Almost 1 million babies a year are not born due to abortions, granted that's not 90%, but the abortion to live birth ratio, as of 2001, was 246 abortions for every 1000 live births, us_abortion_statistics (http://www.abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics), certainly not a number to be discounted.

I googled, and used those statistics, looks like a pro-life site, so they are probably skewed high, but the point is valid if the number is ballparked



If you're going to cite statistics why not just go with the CDC (http://www.cdc.gov/mmWR/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5407a1.htm)?
By your admission ("granted it's not 90%") you can not compare the death of 90% of Americans and the near extinction of human population to a few million abortions.
If I have to worry about the death of bunch of cells (that's what a fetus is for the first 4 months, I mean it can't think, it can't talk, it's an attachment to a woman's body that can't do anything) I'd be depressed about all the spermicide I've been committing all these years.


TTL, it's not that I think I'm better than everyone else, it's just that I think you people half-ass everything. With you being at the top of the leader-board of course.

saden1
02-16-2010, 03:00 PM
So when its all said and done you only believe in choice when in benifits you.

That's one factor in many. Obviously if someone comes to me with firstdown's stolen boat and tries to sell it to me I'll choose to let you know your boat has been stolen. My choice is based on my moral compass.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum