Jason campbells trade value

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9

Ruhskins
01-18-2010, 10:21 PM
No because Betts is Old and had a bad knee injury.. Our best bet for good picks is trading 47.

You mean our tight end who had a foot injury? Solid.

I still think this whole "let's trade Cooley" thing is laughable. Just as laughable as the notion of drafting a QB with a twice-injured shoulder with the #4.

Redskin301
01-18-2010, 10:22 PM
From what team? Vinny isn't working these days.
the browns rams raiders bills 49ers teams that do not want to give the 1st round pick on a QB but need one

WaldSkins
01-18-2010, 10:25 PM
You mean our tight end who had a foot injury? Solid.

I still think this whole "let's trade Cooley" thing is laughable. Just as laughable as the notion of drafting a QB with a twice-injured shoulder with the #4.

I prefer Clausen over Bradford

ArtMonkDrillz
01-18-2010, 10:29 PM
the browns rams raiders bills 49ers teams that do not want to give the 1st round pick on a QB but need oneHe also has, at most, a year left on his contract. So those teams might be inclined to just wait until he is a FA rather than giving up a 2nd.

wolfeskins
01-18-2010, 10:39 PM
Sounds good - - if only it were correct. And it is not....

he wasn't? we still have campbell, the bears have cutler and the broncos have orton. i call that choosing orton over campbell. if denver thought campbell was better than orton they would have accepted our offer.

Redskin301
01-18-2010, 10:46 PM
he wasn't? we still have campbell, the bears have cutler and the broncos have orton. i call that choosing orton over campbell. if denver thought campbell was better than orton they would have accepted our offer.
are offer was 2 first and Jcam the bears gave orton two 1st and a 3rd

Ruhskins
01-18-2010, 10:46 PM
he wasn't? we still have campbell, the bears have cutler and the broncos have orton. i call that choosing orton over campbell. if denver thought campbell was better than orton they would have accepted our offer.

Well McD sort of chose Orton over Cutler too.

Redskin301
01-18-2010, 10:47 PM
He also has, at most, a year left on his contract. So those teams might be inclined to just wait until he is a FA rather than giving up a 2nd.

He's a RFA if thers no CBA

sportscurmudgeon
01-18-2010, 10:49 PM
he wasn't? we still have campbell, the bears have cutler and the broncos have orton. i call that choosing orton over campbell. if denver thought campbell was better than orton they would have accepted our offer.

If that is what you call it and if you ignore all of the rest of the parts of the deal that went down, that is a good indication as to why there aren't a half-dozen NFL teams knocking down your doors to make you their Director of Player Personnel or their GM.


It was NEVER a choice of Cutler/Campbell/Orton. If it were that simple, Danny Boy would have bid higher in terms of money for the three of them and gotten Orotn - - whom the Skins lusted after - - than the notoriously cheap Bears. This was a deal that Danny Boy's money could not make all by itself.

wilsowilso
01-18-2010, 10:50 PM
Another team would get better value by trading for him and we would get worse value in trading him away.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum