MTK
01-13-2010, 07:56 AM
Perhaps we should temper all negativity as well and truly be in wait and see mode.
The Tempered Expectations ThreadMTK 01-13-2010, 07:56 AM Perhaps we should temper all negativity as well and truly be in wait and see mode. Skinny Tee 01-13-2010, 08:45 AM Perhaps we should temper all negativity as well and truly be in wait and see mode. Tempering anything in Redskinsland is an exercise in futility : ) I'll just be happy if we're playing within the confines of a competitive scheme and selecting personnel based on that as well. MTK 01-13-2010, 08:49 AM Tempering anything in Redskinsland is an exercise in futility : ) I'll just be happy if we're playing within the confines of a competitive scheme and selecting personnel based on that as well. True, there's no staying medium around here BigHairedAristocrat 01-13-2010, 09:16 AM "Stay medium." Isn't that the philosphy of arguably the worst coach in our franchise's history? Shanahan failed in Denver for two primary reasons: 1) He had final say over personnel and Denver repeatedly made poor personnel decisions 2) He picked poor defensive coordinators Shanahan's been here a week and we know two things about him. 1) he has final say over personnel 2) He picked a poor defensive coordinator Taking a "wait and see" approach and expecting to see different results is like watching a child, who has repeatedly put his hand on a hot stovetop, reach for that hot stove stop top again and taking a "wait and see approach" to see if he gets burned. Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results... isn't that what we criticized the LAST regime for? Isn't that what we called insanity? So what does that say about those here who are taking a "wait and see" approach as they see history repeating itself over again before their eyes? MTK 01-13-2010, 09:26 AM Ugh we get it dude, you hate everything the team does right now and we're doomed. Personally I don't see where we're continuing with the same old in any regard. Vinny is gone, new GM, new coach with a proven track record, Snyder out of the way, etc. It just seems that you are intent on spinning everything to the negative, there's really no use in trying to convince you otherwise. BigHairedAristocrat 01-13-2010, 09:49 AM Ugh we get it dude, you hate everything the team does right now and we're doomed. Personally I don't see where we're continuing with the same old in any regard. Vinny is gone, new GM, new coach with a proven track record, Snyder out of the way, etc. It just seems that you are intent on spinning everything to the negative, there's really no use in trying to convince you otherwise. Mike Shanahan - "proven track record"??? What do you mean by that? He won ONE playoff win in the last ten years. If you want to go back 11-15 years, then yeah, he had alot of success. But so did Gibbs 1.0. Instead of thinking Shanahan can replicate what he did 11-15 years ago, aren't you the slightest bit concerned about why he couldnt come close to that level of success in the past ten years? What on earth makes you think we're getting Shanahan of 11-15 years ago, and not Shanahan of 10 years ago to the present? When shanahan has a history of selecting poor defensive coordinators and he's hired yet another one, what makes you expect a different result? you keep criticising me for being negative. I'm a redskins fan but I don't wear burgundy and gold colored glasses. I don't put blind faith in every move the redskins make and think it will succeed because i'm a fan. Its a shame that the skins have been bad for so long that people's standards have dropped so low. I don't automatically hate everything the team does. If we had, for example, hired Eric DeCosta as GM and he had interviewed 4-5 candidates and ultimately hired Bill Cowher as head coach, who then hired Charlie Weiss as OC and Romeo Crennel as DC, i wou'dnt be hating a thing. I don't know how all of those people would have worked togehter, but they each have had proven track records of success in their respective areas of expertise. The men we've selected to fill those roles with this team haven't anywhere near that same level of success. I'm skeptical - not because I want to be - but because I'm not all that impressed with the resume's of a single one of the hires we've made. We've basically taken a bunch of people who have been poor to above average in their respective areas of expertise over the last decade and we're expecting these guys to somehow all "get it right" and take us to the promised land. But why? What evidence do we have to merit such faith? you say you can't change my mind - well you know what? you CAN change my mind. I just need EVIDENCE. What EVIDENCE do you have that: 1) Bruce Allen and Mike Shanahan will do better at drafting players than they did in Tampa Bay and Denver. 2) Jim Haslett will be a better defensive coordinator than he has been in the past. Give me any argument that contains evidence and not "we just have to wait and see" and i'll be THRILLED beyond belief. SkinEmAll 01-13-2010, 10:06 AM bighair, you ever consider anti-depressants ? MTK 01-13-2010, 10:17 AM Mike Shanahan - "proven track record"??? What do you mean by that? He won ONE playoff win in the last ten years. If you want to go back 11-15 years, then yeah, he had alot of success. But so did Gibbs 1.0. Instead of thinking Shanahan can replicate what he did 11-15 years ago, aren't you the slightest bit concerned about why he couldnt come close to that level of success in the past ten years? What on earth makes you think we're getting Shanahan of 11-15 years ago, and not Shanahan of 10 years ago to the present? When shanahan has a history of selecting poor defensive coordinators and he's hired yet another one, what makes you expect a different result? you keep criticising me for being negative. I'm a redskins fan but I don't wear burgundy and gold colored glasses. I don't put blind faith in every move the redskins make and think it will succeed because i'm a fan. Its a shame that the skins have been bad for so long that people's standards have dropped so low. I don't automatically hate everything the team does. If we had, for example, hired Eric DeCosta as GM and he had interviewed 4-5 candidates and ultimately hired Bill Cowher as head coach, who then hired Charlie Weiss as OC and Romeo Crennel as DC, i wou'dnt be hating a thing. I don't know how all of those people would have worked togehter, but they each have had proven track records of success in their respective areas of expertise. The men we've selected to fill those roles with this team haven't anywhere near that same level of success. I'm skeptical - not because I want to be - but because I'm not all that impressed with the resume's of a single one of the hires we've made. We've basically taken a bunch of people who have been poor to above average in their respective areas of expertise over the last decade and we're expecting these guys to somehow all "get it right" and take us to the promised land. But why? What evidence do we have to merit such faith? you say you can't change my mind - well you know what? you CAN change my mind. I just need EVIDENCE. What EVIDENCE do you have that: 1) Bruce Allen and Mike Shanahan will do better at drafting players than they did in Tampa Bay and Denver. 2) Jim Haslett will be a better defensive coordinator than he has been in the past. Give me any argument that contains evidence and not "we just have to wait and see" and i'll be THRILLED beyond belief. Proven track record as in look at Shanahan's career accomplishments. I think that speaks for itself. It's not about blind faith man, it's about letting things play out and giving this new regime a chance before you write off everything. Right now nobody knows for sure how this is all going to work. I can't tell you it's going to work, just like you can't tell me it's not going to work. Everyone can spin all the stats and numbers all they want to fit their views, truth is we have to see how things play out on the field. Brody81 01-13-2010, 10:19 AM Perhaps we should temper all negativity as well and truly be in wait and see mode. Agreed!!! We need to take a wait and see approach this year. Everyone needs to take a step back from the ledge, and give JH a chance. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Brody81 01-13-2010, 10:24 AM "Stay medium." Isn't that the philosphy of arguably the worst coach in our franchise's history? Shanahan failed in Denver for two primary reasons: 1) He had final say over personnel and Denver repeatedly made poor personnel decisions 2) He picked poor defensive coordinators Shanahan's been here a week and we know two things about him. 1) he has final say over personnel 2) He picked a poor defensive coordinator Taking a "wait and see" approach and expecting to see different results is like watching a child, who has repeatedly put his hand on a hot stovetop, reach for that hot stove stop top again and taking a "wait and see approach" to see if he gets burned. Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results... isn't that what we criticized the LAST regime for? Isn't that what we called insanity? So what does that say about those here who are taking a "wait and see" approach as they see history repeating itself over again before their eyes? Gloomy Gus is at it again!!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum