|
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
[ 11]
12
13
BigHairedAristocrat 01-12-2010, 01:35 PM So, what are the chances Snyder wants to have 1-2 hour meetings to break down film with Shanahan, too?
D.C. Sports Bog - Jim Zorn broke down game film with Dan Snyder (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2010/01/jim_zorn_broke_down_game_film.html)
Redskin Jim 01-12-2010, 01:50 PM Our offensive line was on a downward slope when Joe Gibbs was here and he has to take some of the blame for our line being where it is now. Who built the Hogs anyway????
Let's wait and see who Shannahan builds his staff with before we jump on him. If rumors of Jerry Gray as our DC turn out to be true, then I might be the first one to question Shanny.
Bobby Beathard, He should be credited for assembling the Hogs, but also Bugel for doing a great job coaching them up.. I'm hoping between Allen and Shanny they adress the O-line first and formost of all of our personell problems. The Redskins will be very fortunate if these two can aquire half the tallent on o-line that Beathard did in the 80's..
So, what are the chances Snyder wants to have 1-2 hour meetings to break down film with Shanahan, too?
D.C. Sports Bog - Jim Zorn broke down game film with Dan Snyder (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2010/01/jim_zorn_broke_down_game_film.html)
Sounds like that's over with thankfully
sometime during the season the weekly film sessions stopped, perhaps as part of the broader changes instituted by Allen. For example, Hellie also talked to a player recently who had attempted to see the owner to lobby for his positional coach to keep his job.
"He was literally stopped at the door by the secretary, who said all football matters have to go through Bruce Allen," Hellie told me. Which seems to make some amount of sense.
Skinny Tee 01-12-2010, 01:53 PM Great thread topic by the way.
All Skins fans should take the enthusiasm out of the front office moves until their is on field production yielded from them.
GMScud 01-12-2010, 01:54 PM So, what are the chances Snyder wants to have 1-2 hour meetings to break down film with Shanahan, too?
D.C. Sports Bog - Jim Zorn broke down game film with Dan Snyder (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2010/01/jim_zorn_broke_down_game_film.html)
Oh god. The Danny and Zorn breaking down film together? I can only imagine how hard other NFL coaches and Execs would laugh at that scene.
I did read one great thing in that post:
Anyhow, sometime during the season the weekly film sessions stopped, perhaps as part of the broader changes instituted by Allen. For example, Hellie also talked to a player recently who had attempted to see the owner to lobby for his positional coach to keep his job.
"He was literally stopped at the door by the secretary, who said all football matters have to go through Bruce Allen," Hellie told me. Which seems to make some amount of sense.
GMScud 01-12-2010, 01:55 PM Great thread topic by the way.
All Skins fans should take the enthusiasm out of the front office moves until their is on field production yielded from them.
I thought it only fitting given the elation around the Shanahan/Allen thing despite how many times we've been burned in the past 10 years.
CRedskinsRule 01-12-2010, 02:58 PM So, what are the chances Snyder wants to have 1-2 hour meetings to break down film with Shanahan, too?
D.C. Sports Bog - Jim Zorn broke down game film with Dan Snyder (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2010/01/jim_zorn_broke_down_game_film.html)
BUT BHA, did you read the last paragraph of this article:
For example, Hellie also talked to a player recently who had attempted to see the owner to lobby for his positional coach to keep his job.
"He was literally stopped at the door by the secretary, who said all football matters have to go through Bruce Allen," Hellie told me. Which seems to make some amount of sense.
This indicates that yes in the past players walked straight up to Snyder's office (as we assumed), interestingly he was directed to Allen, not Shanahan, so there is some level of equality and separation, and BA is taking full control of the GM level issues. Seems like a good end to an otherwise unsettling article.
Also, I still don't mind if DS sits in on game film study, but what was the "Shudder" part is that JZ felt if he didn't do it, someone else(VC) would do it, and manipulate DS through it. Anyone else still rejoicing that VC is gone?!
Skinny Tee 01-12-2010, 03:05 PM I thought it only fitting given the elation around the Shanahan/Allen thing despite how many times we've been burned in the past 10 years.
*****
I just re-read what I wrote and noticed that I accidentally put "their" when I should have put "there"
That is a typo and not a lack of knowing the correct usage of "there".
...I really can't stand when people do that so I wanted to correct it.
*****
Expectations should be tempered just on the fact that our team needs to be overhauled just to get the right personnel for these coaches in the appropriate places. Our OL needs to be overhauled and that alone is 5 positions of starters/backups that need to be addressed.
Rome wasn't built in a day and if you think it can be then you're suffering from the same lack of foundation that the Skins have.
BigHairedAristocrat 01-12-2010, 03:07 PM BUT BHA, did you read the last paragraph of this article:
This indicates that yes in the past players walked straight up to Snyder's office (as we assumed), interestingly he was directed to Allen, not Shanahan, so there is some level of equality and separation, and BA is taking full control of the GM level issues. Seems like a good end to an otherwise unsettling article.
Also, I still don't mind if DS sits in on game film study, but what was the "Shudder" part is that JZ felt if he didn't do it, someone else(VC) would do it, and manipulate DS through it. Anyone else still rejoicing that VC is gone?!
Ugh. I shudder every time Kevin plays the sound clip of VC saying "for the fans." It literally makes me nauseaus.
BA was definitely "running interference" between the coaches/players and Snyder. The only question is, at what point does Snyder decide to go around Allen to get more involved. Not once, during Snyder's 11 year ownership of the team, has been able to stay out of the way of the men he's hired to do their jobs. Everything seems all rosey to some folks here, but what happens if Shanahan starts 2-6 in his second year with the team? Only then will we really know if things have truly changed.
People can make all the arguments they want about how its Snyders team and he should have "X" amount of involvement. But history has shown that whenever Snyder meddles, he makes a bad situation even worse.
tryfuhl 01-12-2010, 04:34 PM So, what are the chances Snyder wants to have 1-2 hour meetings to break down film with Shanahan, too?
D.C. Sports Bog - Jim Zorn broke down game film with Dan Snyder (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2010/01/jim_zorn_broke_down_game_film.html)
Hellie asked the coach why he would take the time to do that with everything else he had on his docket. Zorn in turn explained that Snyder had wanted someone to watch tape with him and that "If someone was going to explain to him why plays were called and why things were run, I wanted it to be me, I didn't want it to be anybody else."
Shudder. Anyhow, sometime during the season the weekly film sessions stopped, perhaps as part of the broader changes instituted by Allen. For example, Hellie also talked to a player recently who had attempted to see the owner to lobby for his positional coach to keep his job.
"He was literally stopped at the door by the secretary, who said all football matters have to go through Bruce Allen," Hellie told me. Which seems to make some amount of sense.
:woot:
|