Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12

jsarno
01-07-2010, 03:45 PM
Campbell has NOT earned a spot on this roster for next year. Sorry guys. His horrible accuracy beyond 15 yards is alarming. He can't even throw a "hail mary" without it sailing out of bounds. His numbers are only there due to dinks and dunks. Might as well bring back Brunell...he can do that too.

T.O.Killa
01-07-2010, 06:22 PM
Campbell has NOT earned a spot on this roster for next year. Sorry guys. His horrible accuracy beyond 15 yards is alarming. He can't even throw a "hail mary" without it sailing out of bounds. His numbers are only there due to dinks and dunks. Might as well bring back Brunell...he can do that too.
Well I want a rookie too, but Campbell's got guts. I want him back next year to show what he can do, with a real coach. If nothing else, so our rookie does'nt get killed in his first year. Campbell earned another year to at least compete to start. He kind of won me over the way Tom Cruise won over Val Kilmer in top gun. He can QB my team anytime, or at least until Bradford is ready to take the helm. Remember, Drew Breese looked terrible until they drafted Phillip Rivers.

Dirtbag59
01-07-2010, 11:59 PM
Colt McCoy just became available to us in the second round.....something to consider.

GTripp0012
01-08-2010, 12:15 AM
but they could work a sign and trade like the pats did with cassel and KC.

or (im not so sure about this one), tender JC at a 1st & 3rd then trade him for a 2nd rounder like the falcons did with schaub to the texans.

can you trade a guy whose on a restricted FA contract? i assume this is what the falcons-texans did and is the most likely scenario for JCs departure if he's not with us next season.It'd technically be a sign-and-trade, but you're functionally correct.

MTK
01-08-2010, 09:16 AM
Campbell has NOT earned a spot on this roster for next year. Sorry guys. His horrible accuracy beyond 15 yards is alarming. He can't even throw a "hail mary" without it sailing out of bounds. His numbers are only there due to dinks and dunks. Might as well bring back Brunell...he can do that too.

Do you think he's at least earned a chance to compete for the job?

irish
01-08-2010, 09:34 AM
Do you think he's at least earned a chance to compete for the job?

I think he has and I think he might even be the starter going into opening day. Depending on who the rookie is and how he looks, I would expect that by the end of the season JC wont be the starter because Shanny will quickly become frustrated with his inaccuracy.

SouperMeister
01-08-2010, 07:09 PM
It's funny how Colt Brennan has become a complete afterthought. There were some on this board who saw him as the future. I still say that Jason should be #1 until someone outplays him in camp, assuming he doesn't sign elsewhere.

Zerohero
01-08-2010, 08:23 PM
It's funny how Colt Brennan has become a complete afterthought. There were some on this board who saw him as the future. I still say that Jason should be #1 until someone outplays him in camp, assuming he doesn't sign elsewhere.

Yeah i dont understand the logic of completely ignoring Brennan.

RedskinMike
01-08-2010, 09:02 PM
Yeah i dont understand the logic of completely ignoring Brennan.

Brennan could be cut, unless shanny thinks colt can succeed i think he is gone.

Zerohero
01-08-2010, 09:45 PM
Brennan could be cut, unless shanny thinks colt can succeed i think he is gone.

I guess if there is a qb that Shanny is sold on and he has already dismissed Brennan. Just from the site it seems Brennan is already an afterthought.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum