SkinEmAll
01-04-2010, 10:59 AM
Thats a really bad idea. The last thing we need this offseason is trading one of the best tight ends in the league for a reciever. That is the least of our concerns this offseason.
Cooley for Marshall?????SkinEmAll 01-04-2010, 10:59 AM Thats a really bad idea. The last thing we need this offseason is trading one of the best tight ends in the league for a reciever. That is the least of our concerns this offseason. FRPLG 01-04-2010, 11:01 AM Making a move like this would just stink of the same old, same old in Washington. I'm hoping the big splashy moves will be a thing of the past now and our main focus will be on building through the draft. I think big splashy moves are fine...when they are for good players and it fits a need that can push you over the top. For example: The AH signing would have been absolutely perfect if it really was the final piece of the pie. Instead it was a continuation of the complete delusion that our FO has seemed to be in for the better part of the decade that our team was any better than average talent-wise. Swarley 01-04-2010, 11:02 AM what is this "oline" you keep speaking of? i feel like i've heard of it before, but its been so long... apparently this "oline" thing helps keep your qb upright and gives your running back holes to run through. Sort of like an engine in a car, it makes things work, but who needs that..... SmootSmack 01-04-2010, 11:02 AM When Cooley was allegedly offered to the Broncos last year they didn't want him. Not sure why they would want him now. Trade doesn't make sense for either side. Monkeydad 01-04-2010, 11:24 AM No way. If we can really utilize Cooley and Davis, who can stop 2 Pro Bowl-caliber TEs? We have some good WRs anyways. If we lose ARE and play Marko, it's a solid core of 4 WRs, 3 of them very young. Redskin Warrior 01-04-2010, 11:37 AM No way. If we can really utilize Cooley and Davis, who can stop 2 Pro Bowl-caliber TEs? We have some good WRs anyways. If we lose ARE and play Marko, it's a solid core of 4 WRs, 3 of them very young. I with you Buster it's a mismatch all day 2 WR, 2 TE, 5 OL, 1 QB & 1 RB that is damn near impossible to stop when executed right. Daseal 01-04-2010, 11:49 AM I'm not against this trade. I think we may be able to get a pick out of the Marshall trade. If a 3rd gets packaged in, I'd be happy. Gives us a real WR for the first time in a long time and maybe another OL with the 3rd. Won't cry if it doesnt happen since I love Cooley. Monkeydad 01-04-2010, 11:49 AM I with you Buster it's a mismatch all day 2 WR, 2 TE, 5 OL, 1 QB & 1 RB that is damn near impossible to stop when executed right. We could even put Cooley or Davis in the slot or spread out as a WR to be covered by a LB or safety in CB-territory. Better Davis than Cooley so Chris can block. When either of them are in the open field, they run over defenders or in Fred's case, hurdles over them. They get the tough yardage and turn stops into first downs. CRedskinsRule 01-04-2010, 12:07 PM what is this "oline" you keep speaking of? i feel like i've heard of it before, but its been so long... Long ago, in days forgotten, a tale was told, one of qb's standing upright, and rb's passing the scrimmage line before the evil hordes could beset them. These tales told of mythical beasts, called Hogs, that kept the beasts of lb's and dt's from thrusting beyond that point of scrimmage. Victory's were many and knightly tales are told to this day of the mythical oline beasts named Hogs. BigHairedAristocrat 01-04-2010, 12:09 PM Long ago, in days forgotten, a tale was told, one of qb's standing upright, and rb's passing the scrimmage line before the evil hordes could beset them. These tales told of mythical beasts, called Hogs, that kept the beasts of lb's and dt's from thrusting beyond that point of scrimmage. Victory's were many and knightly tales are told to this day of the mythical oline beasts named Hogs. sounds amazing! How can we get one of these mystical "olines"? |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum