SouperMeister
01-06-2010, 01:24 PM
I'm happy with Moss, Thomas, Kelly, and Mitchell as our WR's going into next year. It's time to STOP focusing resources on WR's and DB's and to bolster the O-line.
Add a Veteran WR?SouperMeister 01-06-2010, 01:24 PM I'm happy with Moss, Thomas, Kelly, and Mitchell as our WR's going into next year. It's time to STOP focusing resources on WR's and DB's and to bolster the O-line. Longtimefan 01-06-2010, 01:35 PM I'm happy with Moss, Thomas, Kelly, and Mitchell as our WR's going into next year. It's time to STOP focusing resources on WR's and DB's and to bolster the O-line. You said it....We have talented players at the WR position already, the missing link is someone who knows what they're doing coaching them. If after the incoming coaching staff completes their evaluation of the players we have at the position they decide we need a veteran WR so be it, that should be their call. Based on what I've witnessed the past six months it looked like we had WR's blocking for Campbell on the line. We could use one player or more at just about every position but the o-line draws top billing. Eknox 01-06-2010, 01:44 PM I might be wrong, but I thought Santana was a veteran, and just as good as any veteran that's free (meaning we don't have to give up anything to get them). How about we concentrate on some of those offensive lineman that are going to be free agents. KLHJ2 01-06-2010, 01:51 PM It's funny how we keep reading through the thread and 10 different prople have said essentially the same thing, but each time it is treated like the ultimate original concept over and over again. It's like watching the Family Feud. You cannot hear each others answers but they have already been used. Meks 01-06-2010, 03:17 PM NO. continuity. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum