|
|
SouperMeister 01-04-2010, 11:29 AM His final numbers:
3,618 yards, 20 TDs, 15 INTs, 64.5% completions, 86.4 rating
All while playing behind a bad OL. Seems like a guy worth keeping around to me.Very servicable numbers considering that this team had a terrible running game and subpar pass protection. The Snyder Doctrine of drafting perimeter/skill position players (especially DB's and WR's) has failed Campbell and the franchise miserably. I don't care if Eric Berry is the 2nd coming of Ed Reed in the 2010 draft. Consistently good teams win the battle in the trenches. It is high time to address the O-line early and often. Give Campbell a fighting chance in the pocket - even Tom Brady could not function behind this sieve.
Trample the Elderly 01-04-2010, 11:51 AM I'll be happy with the decision that the new administration makes, because it's not Cerrato's dumb ass.
over the mountain 01-04-2010, 12:38 PM Just an FYI - Carson Palmer's numbers:
3,094, 21 TDs, 13 INTs, 60.5% completions, 83.6 rating
before yesterday's game on JC's 3,000 passing yds, more than 2,000 came after the catch. about 58% of his pass yds are from yac. thats by far more than any other team in the nfl.
he is what he is. an average qb with most of his completions being within 10 yds.
Paintrain 01-04-2010, 12:42 PM before yesterday's game on JC's 3,000 passing yds, more than 2,000 came after the catch. about 58% of his pass yds are from yac. thats by far more than any other team in the nfl.
he is what he is. an average qb with most of his completions being within 10 yds.
He's also what virtually every analyst who did a Redskins game said he is, a QB that a team can win with. He's not, and will probably never will be, elite at the level of a Peyton, Brady, Brees but in the right situation I think he can be every bit of the Eli, Schaub, McNabb type of QB. He's not going to carry a team but he's not going to torpedo your teams chances either.
skinsfan69 01-04-2010, 12:45 PM His final numbers:
3,618 yards, 20 TDs, 15 INTs, 64.5% completions, 86.4 rating
All while playing behind a bad OL. Seems like a guy worth keeping around to me.
mark brunell had similar numbers and everyone wanted to run him off.
over the mountain 01-04-2010, 12:46 PM He's also what virtually every analyst who did a Redskins game said he is, a QB that a team can win with. He's not, and will probably never will be, elite at the level of a Peyton, Brady, Brees but in the right situation I think he can be every bit of the Eli, Schaub, McNabb type of QB. He's not going to carry a team but he's not going to torpedo your teams chances either.
yeah i know and agree. the announcer yesterday said the same "you can win with jason campbell" mantra but he also said "things just dont process quickly enough for him". i agree with both, that you can win with JC and that his D reads and decision making just doesnt click fast enough.
skinsfan69 01-04-2010, 12:52 PM He's also what virtually every analyst who did a Redskins game said he is, a QB that a team can win with. He's not, and will probably never will be, elite at the level of a Peyton, Brady, Brees but in the right situation I think he can be every bit of the Eli, Schaub, McNabb type of QB. He's not going to carry a team but he's not going to torpedo your teams chances either.
the teams w/ elite qb play have a better chance of winning. if the fo thinks bradford is the guy then we should take him.
A new coach usually means a new QB. Especially with a guy who is so hands on with his QB's like Shanahan. I've got no problem with drafting a QB if that's the decision.
Kalisto2010 01-04-2010, 01:16 PM I can only conjure 2 words to define this poll. Stockholm Syndrome.
Monkeydad 01-04-2010, 01:42 PM I can only conjure 2 words to define this poll. Stockholm Syndrome.
San Francisco! :benched:
Let me guess, you were on the Sanchez wagon.
|