Do You Want Jason Campbell Back in 2010?

Gtripp you are usually right on and I always agree with you, but you'r saying that our QB has nothing to do with wins and losses? C'Mon man that's insane. Rodgers has gotten sacked more than Campbell and he has 29 Td's and has his team on a roll. Yea they are better than us but QB makes a huge difference.I'm not really comparing Rodgers to Campbell. I'm saying Rodgers is a top ten QB in the mind of dreamers. He won 5 games last year, 10 games this year, and he's a game below .500 in his career with a superior team to the Redskins. In essence, he's where Jason Campbell was at this point last year.

All I know is... Rogers is helping me win my fantasy league...

63.9% completion, 4,100 yds, 29TDs, only 7 INTs, AND 314 rushing yards...

... all with getting sacked 50 times??

How can anyone say he isn't one of the elite QBs entering the "Teens"??

Gtripp you are usually right on and I always agree with you, but you'r saying that our QB has nothing to do with wins and losses? C'Mon man that's insane. Rodgers has gotten sacked more than Campbell and he has 29 Td's and has his team on a roll. Yea they are better than us but QB makes a huge difference.

All you have to do is watch Rogers. He brings his game with him.

Id rather have Blache fired and JC retained then Bradford drafted and us continue to stick with the same vanilla defensive playcalling.

All I know is... Rogers is helping me win my fantasy league...

63.9% completion, 4,100 yds, 29TDs, only 7 INTs, AND 314 rushing yards...

... all with getting sacked 50 times??

How can anyone say he isn't one of the elite QBs entering the "Teens"??Nothing on his year. Anyone with those kind of numbers can win a whole bunch of games.

Any QB who takes 50 sacks will neither have a very long career, nor a very effective one. Driver will be 35 next year. Rodgers struggled mightily against Minnesota, and they needed to get a better effort from their quarterback in those games.

Much like Campbell has struggled against New York, when his team needs it the most, Rodgers has a ton to prove before he can be a top ten QB. I wouldn't call Campbell a top ten QB either, I'm just saying that if we lower the bar far enough, I can sure as hell make a convincing argument.

I'd LOVE to "complain" or "try and put down" Campbell for throwing for 4,100yds, over 30 TDs, and less than 10 INTs...

I guess I'm still losing the logic here...

Brady took a bad loss to the Saints, so he is no longer "top 10"?? I mean sometimes guys do have off games and their teams lose for reason other than them...

and by the way...

Rogers numbers vs Minnesota this year:

Game 1: 70.3%, 384 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT
Game 2: 63.4%, 287 yds, 3 TD, 0 INT

660 yards, 5 TDs, 1 INT total in 2 games... if that is "stuggling mightily" versus your number one rival (Cowboys)... you'll NEVER be happy with any Redskins QB! lol

The Packers defense gave up 68 total points in those 2 games... not sure how to blame that on Rogers...

^ dude everyone gives jc so many excuses! Idk why? He isn't that good mayb that's why. Rogers is a beast, Campbell is just avg. I'm tired of avg

Campbell is 12 games under .500 for his career, with 53 tds 37 ints in 4 1/2 yrs. He avg around 15 tds a year, you can't win with that enough said

I'm very conflicted on this question because on one hand I want Jason back because I think he's our best option at QB for next year. I don't like any of the QB's in the draft this year. On the other hand I think JC will always be just an okay QB and nothing more. I don't think he will ever lead a team to the Super Bowl. In the end I answered yes, only because he's our best option for next year and I don't want to invest a high draft pick one of the QB's coming out this year. Beyond the 2010 season, however, I feel like we're going to need to find a new QB.

I'd LOVE to "complain" or "try and put down" Campbell for throwing for 4,100yds, over 30 TDs, and less than 10 INTs...

I guess I'm still losing the logic here...

Brady took a bad loss to the Saints, so he is no longer "top 10"?? I mean sometimes guys do have off games and their teams lose for reason other than them...

and by the way...

Rogers numbers vs Minnesota this year:

Game 1: 70.3%, 384 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT
Game 2: 63.4%, 287 yds, 3 TD, 0 INT

660 yards, 5 TDs, 1 INT total in 2 games... if that is "stuggling mightily" versus your number one rival (Cowboys)... you'll NEVER be happy with any Redskins QB! lol

The Packers defense gave up 68 total points in those 2 games... not sure how to blame that on Rogers...Sacks, pretty much. Cluelessness in the pocket is a great way to lose games without hurting QB rating. Campbell has had a fair share of failures of this sort, as well.

I don't think anyone said Marc Bulger was struggling mightily when he was making all those probowls with the greatest show on turf, but he and Rodgers are basically the same player.

And I'd much rather have the guy who tears up the league for two or three years in a great offense and then gets injured and takes a beating and sucks for the next five years or so than the alternative of drafting a bust. I don't think I've ever tried to call Rodgers a bust, and I think he's quite deserving of a pro bowl selection because it's a single year achievement.

But being a top ten QB, I think, is never about what you can do/win in a single year. And this year is really all Rodgers has. Lifetime, he's a .500 QB with above average numbers. Warner, Favre, Pennington, Romo are all more accomplished than this, and still play at every bit as high a level as Rodgers does.

Anyway, enough about Aaron Rodgers put downs. This is a Jason Campbell thread, and the reason that Rodgers' name isn't coming up in replacement talks is that he's a well-coached quarterback in a great organization. He shouldn't have to apologize for that.