Do You Want Jason Campbell Back in 2010?

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

rbanerjee23
12-29-2009, 07:42 PM
I want great too..I just don't want to go through a franchise killer like Leaf/Couch/Quinn who come in and then its just 3-4 years to recover...I would rather keep him and have a decent team

skinsfaninok
12-29-2009, 07:50 PM
I'm not sure I'm prepaired for the breakin stage, however, Sanchez has made it interesting for the Jets.

Interesting link to look at: Some surprises to me do to hype.

NFL career passer rating leaders - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_career_passer_rating_leaders)


All what matters man is overall record... Romo and Rivers are amazing and have great records, Campbell's record is terrible! His number's are because of the style that he play's. He just completes short passes that create a high comp. percentage and good rating. When you watch the games you can see why he's not very effective, horrible decision making and bad accuracy. He's a backup QB at best after this season except in (Oak) and that's why they are bad.

skinsfaninok
12-29-2009, 07:52 PM
I want great too..I just don't want to go through a franchise killer like Leaf/Couch/Quinn who come in and then its just 3-4 years to recover...I would rather keep him and have a decent team

So you want .500 instead of a chance to be a contender every year?????? :doh:

Longtimefan
12-29-2009, 07:53 PM
Since we're getting a new coach we're getting a new system. Time for a new QB. Campbell had his chance and has never lead us to a playoff. Time to go.

Who would you suggest we replace him with?

GTripp0012
12-29-2009, 08:00 PM
All what matters man is overall record... Romo and Rivers are amazing and have great records, Campbell's record is terrible! His number's are because of the style that he play's. He just completes short passes that create a high comp. percentage and good rating. When you watch the games you can see why he's not very effective, horrible decision making and bad accuracy. He's a backup QB at best after this season except in (Oak) and that's why they are bad.So, basically, you're saying:

1) Campbell is good at what he does
2) What he does/is told to do doesn't help us win

3) The problem must be Campbell

Clearly, you have a thinking problem.

Hail to the Redskins
12-29-2009, 08:02 PM
Slap me on the wridt if someone already brought this up...

but if Zorn ends up in Cleveland as OC or QB Coach... what do you think Cleveland would be willing to give up for Campbell??

This scenario seems logically possible... if Zorn likes Jason as a QB that is...

Hail to the Redskins
12-29-2009, 08:02 PM
Slap me on the wrist if someone already brought this up...

but if Zorn ends up in Cleveland as OC or QB Coach... what do you think Cleveland would be willing to give up for Campbell??

This scenario seems logically possible... if Zorn likes Jason as a QB that is...

skinsfaninok
12-29-2009, 08:02 PM
So, basically, you're saying:

1) Campbell is good at what he does
2) What he does/is told to do doesn't help us win

3) The problem must be Campbell

Clearly, you have a thinking problem.

I never said JC is the main reason that we have been bad. Stop backing this guy if his overall record shows the truth, you just look at numbers obviously. Jc has had multiple chances to show his worth, remember this guy was just 1 pick behind Rodgers whom has become a top 10 qb.

GTripp0012
12-29-2009, 08:06 PM
I never said JC is the main reason that we have been bad. Stop backing this guy if his overall record shows the truth, you just look at numbers obviously. Jc has had multiple chances to show his worth, remember this guy was just 1 pick behind Rodgers whom has become a top 10 qb.Rodgers is a top ten QB only in the mind of dreamers. The guy took 50 sacks this year.

Campbell has shown plenty of worth. Our losing has never been about him, much as our winning has never been about him. It's been about our joke of a defense, and our offensive line which needs no introduction. Our winning was about our running game.

skinsfaninok
12-29-2009, 08:09 PM
Rodgers is a top ten QB only in the mind of dreamers.

Campbell has shown plenty of worth. Our losing has never been about him, much as our winning has never been about him. It's been about our joke of a defense, and our offensive line which needs no introduction. Our winning was about our running game.

Gtripp you are usually right on and I always agree with you, but you'r saying that our QB has nothing to do with wins and losses? C'Mon man that's insane. Rodgers has gotten sacked more than Campbell and he has 29 Td's and has his team on a roll. Yea they are better than us but QB makes a huge difference.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum