How Bad Is Brunell Really? [Archive] - Page 3 - Commanders Post at The Warpath

MTK

10-25-2004, 02:29 PM

AND YET, DALLAS STILL HAS A BETTER RECORD THAN US!!!! (and no running game)

and now its 700 more yards... first you blamed the running game, now you're blaming injury and pass protection for brunell sucking hard... garcia has even worse protection and is doing much better... our pass protection is actually pretty decent, but no protection is perfect 100% of the time, and i find it really convenient that every play protection breaks down happens to be the long bomb death shot for a sure TD... brunell hasn't hit open guys at medium range much less bombs or a hail mary.
Actually Dallas is 2-4 now just like the Skins


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum > How Bad Is Brunell Really? PDA How Bad Is Brunell Really? Pages : 1 2 [3] MTK 10-25-2004, 02:29 PM AND YET, DALLAS STILL HAS A BETTER RECORD THAN US!!!! (and no running game) and now its 700 more yards... first you blamed the running game, now you're blaming injury and pass protection for brunell sucking hard... garcia has even worse protection and is doing much better... our pass protection is actually pretty decent, but no protection is perfect 100% of the time, and i find it really convenient that every play protection breaks down happens to be the long bomb death shot for a sure TD... brunell hasn't hit open guys at medium range much less bombs or a hail mary. Actually Dallas is 2-4 now just like the Skins That Guy 10-25-2004, 05:31 PM actually dallas is 1-1 in the division, meaning their record is better. remember... they beat us. SUNRA 10-25-2004, 11:11 PM I'm a nightmare. And so has 11 seasons before you arrived. One letdown after another.