Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

PennSkinsFan
12-23-2009, 04:49 PM
http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/12/23/46-mocks-bradford-remains-pick-for-redskins.html (http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/12/23/46-mocks-bradford-remains-pick-for-redskins.html)



This is the largest amount of Mocks the Database has munched together for it’s Top 6 leaders. There are a total of 46 mock drafts updated from DEC 16 through today DEC 23.


When looking at the Washington Redskins, most mocks have the Redskins projected on the Draft Order, at #6. Some have the Redskins at #7. Either way, we have you covered.

Drift Reality
12-27-2009, 07:47 PM
I think Bradford is actually a good pick if A) Okung is not available or B) there isn't a trade-down offer on the table that would allow them to move back to 11-15 and pick up an additional day 1 pick (or some other scenario that would allow them to expand their draft)

Texanskin
12-27-2009, 08:44 PM
if we draft Bradford..this means we didn't address the line...which means the next QB behind center in 2010 will have to be a tough SOB since the line will get you killed...Bradfords shoulder has proven this would be a MISTAKE. KEEP the tough guy Campbell..draft OL with 1st three possible picks

skins89moss
12-27-2009, 09:02 PM
I rather take any other position besides QB with our 1st pick. 2nd round if we have to take a QB pick Tony Pike. Jimmy Clausen is better than Bradford.

CultBrennan59
12-27-2009, 09:05 PM
I think Bradford is actually a good pick if A) Okung is not available or B) there isn't a trade-down offer on the table that would allow them to move back to 11-15 and pick up an additional day 1 pick (or some other scenario that would allow them to expand their draft)

I agree 100%

Ruhskins
12-27-2009, 09:09 PM
I think Bradford is actually a good pick if A) Okung is not available or B) there isn't a trade-down offer on the table that would allow them to move back to 11-15 and pick up an additional day 1 pick (or some other scenario that would allow them to expand their draft)

Bradford will only be a good pick if he drops down to the 2nd round and we address other areas of need. I would prefer not to put this guy in a position to start, let him ride the pine, and make sure his shoulder doesn't bust up again.

Hog1
12-27-2009, 09:57 PM
I love this sh.. We don't have a coach, but we know who the first pick is?

SmootSmack
12-27-2009, 11:10 PM
I think Bradford is actually a good pick if A) Okung is not available or B) there isn't a trade-down offer on the table that would allow them to move back to 11-15 and pick up an additional day 1 pick (or some other scenario that would allow them to expand their draft)

Agreed. If the Redskins pick at #6 and Okung is already gone then there really isn't a good OT available that high. We can still address the line during the rest of the draft.

Pocket$ $traight
12-28-2009, 12:25 AM
So who is ready for another 3-4 years like this if we pick the next Jamarcus.

This team is dogshit. The wet kind, not dry.

GusFrerotte
12-28-2009, 01:46 AM
if we draft Bradford..this means we didn't address the line...which means the next QB behind center in 2010 will have to be a tough SOB since the line will get you killed...Bradfords shoulder has proven this would be a MISTAKE. KEEP the tough guy Campbell..draft OL with 1st three possible picks

Bradford will get crushed with that bum shoulder. It would be a disaster just as big as Heath Schuler!!!!!

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum