Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Pages : 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Larry Michael is Satan
12-30-2009, 12:35 AM
Shanahan wants Bradford.

SBXVII
12-30-2009, 03:11 AM
Well you all can count Clausen out for the Skins.

He doesn't have D.Rosenhause. ;)

Clausen chooses Wichard | ProFootballTalk.com (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/29/clausen-chooses-wichard/)

SBXVII
12-30-2009, 03:16 AM
I know I know it's PFT, but....

Keep an eye on Redskins and Sam Bradford | ProFootballTalk.com (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/29/keep-an-eye-on-redskins-and-sam-bradford/)

Some of you should get excited. I found the part about Bradford's doctor working for the Skins very interesting. :)

SmootSmack
12-30-2009, 08:21 AM
The Andrews' news has been talked about here before. And if there's one thing we learned so far through this whole Shanahan search is that he likes everything "very interested in the Bills job" "very interested in the Bears job" "Very interested in the Gators job" etc. Not to say that he doesn't like Bradford, and it does make a lot of sense. Just saying let's not read too much into it right now

Longtimefan
12-30-2009, 10:49 AM
I rather take any other position besides QB with our 1st pick. 2nd round if we have to take a QB pick Tony Pike. Jimmy Clausen is better than Bradford.

Someone has to play here until a player like Bradford is NFL ready, no one has any idea how long that will be. I'm not in favor of continuing to draft these QB's early in the first round searching for that aloof (franchise QB). This team has far too many holes to fill without a maximum draft, if we don't address the O-line significantly in the draft we had better raise hell in free agency.

KLHJ2
12-30-2009, 11:03 AM
You know, f' it. Let's go ahead and draft a QB stick him behind this line and watch 30+ million in guaranteed money go down the tube in a hand basket because we get him killed before he even learns how to play in the NFL. I'm all for it and hey at that rate we will get to see JC behind the same line and taking the same punishment all over again!

If you cannot sense the sarcasm I do not know how much more blatant I can put it.

Placing a high profile QB behind this line is like parking a Ferrari in the middle of a highway. It is a stupid decision. Buy your Ferrari a garage first! Don’t worry, Ferrari will make a newer model next year you do not have to buy one right now.

Longtimefan
12-30-2009, 11:28 AM
What about the Colt? No one talks about him anymore.

The question is strictly for the cult following, not thread worthy.

rbanerjee23
12-30-2009, 11:44 AM
Agreed. I want ZERO part of Sam Bradford or Colt McCoy. Guys like Pike, Lefevour, Zac Robinson, Max Hall, and others will all be available later. Plus don't forget about the beloved Colt Brennan coming back. If we have a pick inside the top 10 and we can't move down or get Okung, just draft CJ Spiller. It's a need and he's a total beast. In which case just address O-line later on in the draft and in FA.

Thank you, can't go wrong with building the O-line, its not like there aren't stud
qb's available later in the draft

murphy196
12-30-2009, 12:04 PM
I will be completely pissed if we draft Bradford!! The guy can't stay healthy and there is no comparison to him and Brees. Brees had a torn Labrum, which is an easy repair with surgery, Bradford's injury is just one hard hit away from putting him on the IR. Claussen looks like the most NFL ready QB that I've seen this year, especially if you want to take one with the first pick. I say if he isn't there when we pick, we trade our #1 for more picks and take a QB in the 2nd or 3rd.

SKINS73
12-30-2009, 12:55 PM
Agreed. I want ZERO part of Sam Bradford or Colt McCoy. Guys like Pike, Lefevour, Zac Robinson, Max Hall, and others will all be available later. Plus don't forget about the beloved Colt Brennan coming back. If we have a pick inside the top 10 and we can't move down or get Okung, just draft CJ Spiller. It's a need and he's a total beast. In which case just address O-line later on in the draft and in FA.

I agree with you on considering CJ Spiller. He is going to be an immediate impact player (not only does he run a 4.3 but he is also a good blocker). The two areas that need to be addressed on offensive BEFORE the QB is the line and running backs (and then we need to look at our secondary). We are using 3rd stringers in those positions right now and have no depth worth mentioning. If Okung is available we should take him, otherwise we take Spiller. At the very least we know that Campbell is OK and will put up OK numbers. I hope everyone agrees that whoever our QB is next year he will get a pounding, regardless of who we draft for the line... and before anyone starts screaming, "Aaron Rodgers has a bad line too!!" Our line is way worse than Green Bay's, we have NO running threat and to top everything off we have poor coaching. No one knows who is going to call what play. While Campbell sounded like a cryer when he said it wasn't fair, he's actually right.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum