Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

warriorzpath
12-14-2009, 05:08 PM
I think JC should be back. I think I lot of the problem he was having was due to Zorn's play-calling and o-line protection.

I'd say that most of Campbell's problem was his trust in Zorn's play-calling and Zorn's trust in him.

I think most people were wrong in assuming that an improved o-line play would be a greater impact than an improved quarterback play (regardless of how the o-line was performing).

The offensive line has NOT played overwhelmingly better in the past 4-5 games, but Campbell has. His improved play has the redskins offense significantly playing better as a whole. I think the argument that I made before the redskins offense was performing better is being proven now - there is no greater impact on a team than how the quarterback is playing.

SmootSmack
12-14-2009, 05:14 PM
Zorn pointed out today that benching Campbell at halftime against KC was a turning point that essentially toughened Campbell up and forced him to take charge of the team if he was willing to. This is what almost everyone inside Redskins Park has been expecting from Campbell, for him to take charge as QB

12thMan
12-14-2009, 05:17 PM
I'd say that most of Campbell's problem was his trust in Zorn's play-calling and Zorn's trust in him.

I think most people were wrong in assuming that an improved o-line play would be a greater impact than an improved quarterback play (regardless of how the o-line was performing).

The offensive line has NOT played overwhelmingly better in the past 4-5 games, but Campbell has. His improved play has the redskins offense significantly playing better as a whole. I think the argument that I made before the redskins offense was performing better is being proven now - there is no greater impact on a team than how the quarterback is playing.

I was watching KJ interview Campbell following the Raiders game and he seemed super relaxed and confident. I've never seen him quite like this following a game.

She asked how much has Sherm Lewis affected his play. He said the offense basically changed gears from, and I'm paraphrasing, a dink and donk to a more intermediate/down the field passing game. He also pointed out how they've put the game in his hands. Said he was thinking too much, and they told him to just go out and play. Even during timeouts, he would come to the sidelines and Zorn would tell him to do whatever it takes to keep the chains moving. If he could run, then run it. If there's a pass down field, then take it. Those are his marching orders now. He made that point to her. I found that interesting.

warriorzpath
12-14-2009, 05:18 PM
Zorn pointed out today that benching Campbell at halftime against KC was a turning point that essentially toughened Campbell up and forced him to take charge of the team if he was willing to. This is what almost everyone inside Redskins Park has been expecting from Campbell, for him to take charge as QB

And this is why I was putting most of the blame on him as a player and Zorn as a coach because (like I said weeks ago) it all starts with these 2. If you have these 2 doing well, your whole team does well. Seems logical enough now, but I was getting a whole lot of flack from having this opinion.

saden1
12-14-2009, 05:30 PM
I'd say that most of Campbell's problem was his trust in Zorn's play-calling and Zorn's trust in him.

I think most people were wrong in assuming that an improved o-line play would be a greater impact than an improved quarterback play (regardless of how the o-line was performing).

The offensive line has NOT played overwhelmingly better in the past 4-5 games, but Campbell has. His improved play has the redskins offense significantly playing better as a whole. I think the argument that I made before the redskins offense was performing better is being proven now - there is no greater impact on a team than how the quarterback is playing.

I don't know man...in the last five games the O-Line has allowed 8 sacks (3 against the Broncos, 1 against Cowboys, 1 against Eagles, 0 against Saints, 3 against Raiders). The eight games before that they allowed 28 sacks (3.5 sacks a game then and 1.6 sacks a game now). I think it would be foolish to say QB play is independent of O-Line play and vice versa is true.

warriorzpath
12-14-2009, 05:40 PM
I don't know man...in the last five games the O-Line has allowed 8 sacks (3 against the Broncos, 1 against Cowboys, 1 against Eagles, 0 against Saints, 3 against Raiders). The eight games before that they allowed 28 sacks (3.5 sacks a game then and 1.6 sacks a game now). I think it would be foolish to say QB play is independent of O-Line play and vice versa is true.

Here we go again... with qb play vs. o-line play. I'm not trying to say they are independent of each other, but I think qb play has the greatest impact on the team by far.

hail_2_da_skins
12-14-2009, 05:49 PM
What more does Jason Campbell have to do to prove his worth? The Campbell haters point to him not leading the team to comebacks or taking the entire team on his shoulders and carrying it through victories. In the last five weeks, that's exactly what I've seen. It has not resulted in victories every week, but is that Campbell's fault? Replay these games and be honest with yourself. These losses have been due to a series of unfortunate events. There is a lot of blame to go around but more so, a lot of bad luck. Jason is doing his job. Bringing in a new college recruit is not going to make the situation better. Getting a gunslinger like Jay Cutler is not going to work either. Let's build on what has already been started. This year, the Skins improved their defensive line. That's been a need for five years or more. Next year, lets build the offensive line. That will improve the overall offense.

saden1
12-14-2009, 05:52 PM
Here we go again... with qb play vs. o-line play. I'm not trying to say they are independent of each other, but I think qb play has the greatest impact on the team by far.

Yeah but you can't solve a picture puzzle with pieces missing. Games really are won and lost in the trenches. JC has been making plays with his feet as well and he deserves credit but let's not forget the big guys upfront.

BTW I do think Zorn is the new Steve Spurrier and his ineffectiveness was at display the first 8 games of the season.

GridIron26
12-14-2009, 06:37 PM
What more does Jason Campbell have to do to prove his worth? The Campbell haters point to him not leading the team to comebacks or taking the entire team on his shoulders and carrying it through victories. In the last five weeks, that's exactly what I've seen. It has not resulted in victories every week, but is that Campbell's fault? Replay these games and be honest with yourself. These losses have been due to a series of unfortunate events. There is a lot of blame to go around but more so, a lot of bad luck. Jason is doing his job. Bringing in a new college recruit is not going to make the situation better. Getting a gunslinger like Jay Cutler is not going to work either. Let's build on what has already been started. This year, the Skins improved their defensive line. That's been a need for five years or more. Next year, lets build the offensive line. That will improve the overall offense.

Amen! :food-smil

Larry Michael is Satan
12-14-2009, 06:52 PM
Why would Jason Campbell want to come back? Sonny is right about next year, it's just a good deal, they only have to pay him 3.5 mil, and could possibly get a 1st and 2nd, not that that's going to happen. I'm sure he'll play one more year here, then be gone, by his choice.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum