Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back

As indifferent as management has been towards Jason Campbell of late, I can't help but think what they have seen from him under trying circumstances does not warrant consideration. He's started every game the last two seasons, taken a beating and remained the consumate professional by never complaining. When one takes into consideration the circumstances under which he has had to perform, he IMO has earned the right to be here with a full complement of players surrounding him.

Further, Jim Zorn has admitted making mistakes and has learned from them. Because he was stripped of his play-calling duties doen not neccessarily preclude him from being a head coach, many head coaches do not call plays. He has done a masterful job at keeping this team focused and playing hard despite the record, and should be commended for it. This entire unit, Sherm Lewis included, deserves to have the opportunity to build on the momentum they've started over the past several weeks. Changing coaches or QB at this point in time would be a set back as well a mistake.

I may get an argument, but again this is just my opinion and some may beg to differ and that's cool too.

I didn't read the story but I think most of us kinda figured that he would be here. I mean if there is no CAP then if the team wants to keep him they can for 1 more year. Most likely they would till either they get someone new or their new QB is understanding what he has to do.

At least with Shanahan JC wouldn't be starting completely over since the basics of the WCO would be there.

With Shanahan Campbell might turn into another Cutler, an interception machine.

With Shanahan Campbell might turn into another Cutler, an interception machine.

Campbell isn't that type of player.

Latest rumor has the Redskins eyeing Jevan Snead as a late 2nd/early 3rd rounder (means they would have to trade of course). Not as a starter right away, but as someone that can be developed over the next couple of years. Could mean the end of Colt Brennan more than anything it means about Campbell. Snead had a poor year, but I think he's pretty solid.

I watched Snead a few times this year and for the life of me can't figure out why someone would draft him in any of the top five rounds.

He has NFL tools, but he isn't a football player and he is crazy erratic. Hope this is just another rumor?

I just read several reviews that all question his mental toughness.
Yikes! That's a death sentence in the NFL.

I watched Snead a few times this year and for the life of me can't figure out why someone would draft him in any of the top five rounds.

He has NFL tools, but he isn't a football player and he is crazy erratic. Hope this is just another rumor?

I just read several reviews that all question his mental toughness.
Yikes! That's a death sentence in the NFL.

I'd imagine he'd be available around the 4th round if they just wait. But I think you hit it on the button when you said he has NFL tools. That's what the appeal is.

Anyhow, it's just December. Things will change for sure. But the biggest story I got from my conversation was that Clausen isn't as high on the team's radar as I had thought. Still, it's early

Isn't this the same Sonny that was saying we would have won more games with Todd Collins?

Psh, John Kerry is pressing charges for copyright infringement.

I think JC should be back. I think I lot of the problem he was having was due to Zorn's play-calling and o-line protection.

Well now that the offense is hitting on all cylinders and Campbell is playing his best football of his career so far, do you really want to make major changes to the offense? If Sherm Lewis, Jim Zorn, and everybody else is out of D.C. at the end of the season, it may mean yet another new offensive scheme for everybody to learn. If this is the case, do you want to keep Campbell? He'll have to start from scratch just like he's done the past few seasons.


Exactly. And then, when the new system hasn't brought a championship in two years, it will be switched again. It would be a good idea for the organization to avoid creating a classic catch-22 situation in which coaches need more than two years to create a successful system while at the same time need success within two years in order to keep their jobs.

Exactly. And then, when the new system hasn't brought a championship in two years, it will be switched again. It would be a good idea for the organization to avoid creating a classic catch-22 situation in which coaches need more than two years to create a successful system while at the same time need success within two years in order to keep their jobs.

We've been in business 77yrs. with 25 different coaches counting Gibbs twice. The math shows that to be a coaching change on average every 3 yrs. It's time for the constant change to take a bow.