GoSkins!
10-20-2004, 09:11 PM
I just think that it's nice that we can be complaining about not doing enough good run blocking after a defensive turnover! What a huge change from last year.
Blocking & tackling after TurnoversGoSkins! 10-20-2004, 09:11 PM I just think that it's nice that we can be complaining about not doing enough good run blocking after a defensive turnover! What a huge change from last year. Daseal 10-20-2004, 10:12 PM Actually, last year we ranked in the top third in takeaway defense (I'm 90% sure of this, cooking dinner, I'll check later) but we didn't seem to hold them when it mattered. SUNRA 10-21-2004, 01:15 AM I suggested on another post that our defense should work on turning turnovers into touchdowns. Joe Crisp suggested that I was asking too much since the defense is playing well. Greg Blache talks about that and other points to improve upon and I would like to here Joe's opinion about what Greg Blache said. Maybe it makes sense coming from an experienced coach rather than an enlightened fan. MTK 10-21-2004, 09:24 AM It would be nice to have the D score, but to expect them to carry the entire team game in and game out is a little unrealistic. The offense needs to start producing, simple as that. irish 10-21-2004, 10:07 AM I agree Matty. That's the only "flaw" I see in the D is that they dont score on the turnovers. That was how Balt won their SB when they had an even worse O than the skins have now - defense scoring on turnovers. If the skins D can get that to happen more often they will be even more devestating. MTK 10-21-2004, 11:41 AM Baltimore had a better offense during their SB run than we have right now, it's not even close. They could run the ball and Dilfer made enough plays to keep defenses honest, we can't say the same of Brunell right now. Plus they had one of the all-time great defenses, our D is very good but not close to being an all-time great. irish 10-21-2004, 01:55 PM Matty, I'm not sure how you could say Balt had a better O than the skins do now when that season the Balt O went something like 6 games without scoring a TD. The skins O may not score much but they do score. I agree hough that Balt did get the running game going enough to eat clock and Dilfer played well enough to not lose games but that did not happen until sometime in Nov. SUNRA 10-21-2004, 02:14 PM It would be nice to have the D score, but to expect them to carry the entire team game in and game out is a little unrealistic. The offense needs to start producing, simple as that. Your'e missing the point. Greg Blache mentioned the defense doesn't have the mindset to block after a turnover because they are so few and in between from the past seasons. The defense is so happy to have the ball that they don't think about returning it for a TD is an insightful observation for a Coach. It's wonderful that we're stopping the run but a defense that produces points is not too much to ask when there are defenses that are scoring against us. That should be the motivating force since none of those defenses are in the top five. Of course, the offense should score more points. Week six has come and gone and I'm certain that the offense we watched in agony will not surface in week eight. Gibbs has devoted the entire bye week time to pass protection and deep pass plays. MTK 10-21-2004, 02:37 PM Matty, I'm not sure how you could say Balt had a better O than the skins do now when that season the Balt O went something like 6 games without scoring a TD. The skins O may not score much but they do score. I agree hough that Balt did get the running game going enough to eat clock and Dilfer played well enough to not lose games but that did not happen until sometime in Nov. So are we comparing our offense right now vs. Baltimore's through those first 6 games?? In that case it's pretty even. If we're comparing our offense now vs. theirs at the end of their season I definitely think they had the better offense. We can't move the ball through the air at all right now. memphisskin 10-21-2004, 07:59 PM That Baltimore offense was horrific, didn't they go like 8 weeks without an offensive touchdown? But I agree with Matty, I'd still take those guys. Passing game - They could at least hit on a few long balls whereas anything over five yards downfield seems to be an adventure for us right now Running game - I wanted to say even but that team had Jamal Lewis running for 1300 yds and Priest Holmes ran for another 500. Turnovers - Say what you want about Dilfer but he knew his role and played it to perfection. He only started 8 games but his numbers were similar to Brunell, sans the fumbles and picks for scores. The missing ingredient in this is special teams. Baltimore had Jermaine Lewis who was a threat to return punts and kickoffs back for scores. So far Johnny Morton hasn't demonstrated that ability us, so far at least. If we had better special teams, we at least put ourselves in a better position to win some of these games. If we can at least not lose the special teams battle every week then our defense is playing well enough to win a lot of games for us. Clearly we now have a defense that is playing superbly. Gibbs is helping them out by running the ball to limit their time on the field. Now if Gibbs can just get the passing game together then we'll be alright. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum