CRedskinsRule
12-08-2009, 02:19 PM
Sorted by College Victories:
1. McCoy 45
2. Tebow 34
3. LeFevour 33
4. Bradford 24
5. Clausen 16
6. Pike 16
7. Locker 7
not really a follower of college, so GTripp could you put games played next to that, or the winning percentage?
Thanks
GTripp0012
12-08-2009, 02:23 PM
not really a follower of college, so GTripp could you put games played next to that, or the winning percentage?
ThanksSorted by College Victories:
1. McCoy 45/53
2. Tebow 34/41
3. LeFevour 33/53
4. Bradford 24/31
5. Clausen 16/34
6. Pike 16/20
7. Locker 7/28
^^^College Victories/College Starts
CRedskinsRule
12-08-2009, 02:29 PM
Thx, I figured Locker had a low number of starts that's really why I asked. That is an awful winning percentage though.
FRPLG
12-08-2009, 02:33 PM
I'm a bigger fan of McCoy. Ulitmately though I think the quality of a QB is so tied into the system and players around him it doesn't much matter. Outside of Manning/Brady/Brees it's hard to see any QB currently in the league going to a bad offense and performing well. I still think with a rebuilt line JC can win us 10-12 games a year from and offensive stand point. But here are probably a dozen other QBs who could also.
GTripp0012
12-08-2009, 02:35 PM
Thx, I figured Locker had a low number of starts that's really why I asked. That is an awful winning percentage though.Yeah. What shocks me with Locker is that with all of the hub-bub about Tebow being asked to play a new position, it's kind of crazy that Locker is behind mentioned as a first rounder. If they both came out this year, there's less than a 1% chance that Locker would make a better professional quarterback than Tebow. But he's definately athletic enough to play safety, or tight end, or fullback at the next level, in fact, he actually played some safety at Washington while also playing at quarterback.
I can't imagine that quarterback would be his best position at the next level, but he might as well go back for another year if he's going to try it. Personally, I don't think Sarkisian is going to let him walk after a 5-7 junior season, he will convince him to stay.
mlmdub130
12-08-2009, 02:35 PM
i've been saying it all year, and i'll say it again, i want pike, he has the size, the arm, the accuracy, and vision, and i think we could pick him up late second round which would allow us to go o line first round
SmootSmack
12-08-2009, 02:36 PM
Add in Zac Robinson and Jevan Snead...and John Skelton :)
mlmdub130
12-08-2009, 02:36 PM
^and by saying that i want to point out i want jc back next year i don't want a rookie qb next year behind a rebuilding line and new system
GTripp0012
12-08-2009, 03:11 PM
Add in Zac Robinson and Jevan Snead...and John Skelton :)I can do Robinson and Snead. If I put Skelton/Randolph in this system without translating their numbers for competition, it would just spit out ridiculously great comparables for two guys who might end up being 4th or 5th round picks. Sure, they might be the next Peyton Manning/Philip Rivers/Ben Roethlisberger, but then, I really hope they don't slip to the 4th round and never get a chance.
Zac Robinson
1. Kellen Clemens
2. Matt Ryan
3. Josh Freeman
4. Byron Leftwich
5. Drew Stanton
6. John Beck
7. John David Booty
Jevan Snead
1. J.P. Losman
2. Joey Harrington
3. Quincy Carter
4. Jim Druckenmiller
5. Marques Tuiasosopo
6. Kyle Boller
7. Kyle Orton
SmootSmack
12-08-2009, 03:17 PM
Don't worry about Randolph. He's Chase Daniel 2010-meaning he won't be drafted (I don't think)
So are you going to share how you got to these results?