skin4Life28
10-18-2004, 09:56 AM
Can anyone explain why Alex Brown da bears DE came in unblocked about 75% of the time and forced Brunell to get flushed out to the sideline?
OL not blocking Alex Brownskin4Life28 10-18-2004, 09:56 AM Can anyone explain why Alex Brown da bears DE came in unblocked about 75% of the time and forced Brunell to get flushed out to the sideline? MTK 10-18-2004, 10:02 AM who was he lining up against? Redskins_P 10-18-2004, 10:08 AM I think Samuels. Did you see how fast Brown was? He was all over the field making plays. MTK 10-18-2004, 10:12 AM I heard Samuels was playing on a bad ankle, can anyone confirm that? That Guy 10-18-2004, 10:27 AM what our coaching staff/players have done thus far is key up on the big threat and ignore "the other guy"... we held simeon rice in check, and strahan (he got 0 sacks, BUT the giants got 5 on the day), and in this game AO was really quiet, but the other guy (alex brown) sure wasn't... it wasn't 75% of plays, but it was a lot... bugel said samuels had a fat ankle for what its worth. Gmanc711 10-18-2004, 10:40 AM Alex Brown looked like a hall of famer yesterday, hopefully Samuels can rest up if that was the case. cpayne5 10-18-2004, 11:03 AM Most of the time when Brown was getting free was when he was against a TE or when the TE would pull and Samuels would either pick up a blitzing LB or help on the DT. This is a scheme though. When this is done, 99% of the time it's a running play to the right. Brown was so fast that he could blast into the backfield and get the RB before he hit the hole. I think they just underestimated Brown's ability. The Bears do have an excellent set of Dlinemen, though. We need a guy named Tank, by the way. We should call Ola Kimrin Tank. memphisskin 10-18-2004, 11:20 AM It figures it was Samuels, he has not played as dominantly as I thought he would this year. I really figured that Samuels and the entire line would blossom under Bugel, and while they are improved it's still not enough to keep our qb upright or to open big holes for Portis. Samuels may have made it to the Pro Bowl a few times, but no one could confuse him for a Pro Bowler in our last 22 games. It was Samuels who gave up that pressure that led to Chicago's only score wasn't it? This season only proves who our best offensive lineman is, and it's not the guy who farts and burps in meetings either. That Guy 10-18-2004, 11:40 AM samuels is good, but i really don't think he's ever really been pro bowl caliber (even when he did get in)... MTK 10-18-2004, 11:56 AM Samuels has been fine this year and has definitely stepped up his play from last year. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum