Pathetic!

Gibbs must be seeing something in Mark that the rest of us aren't. I think the kid (Ramsey) should start, but its not looking too good for that.

I have to question Gibbs on this one.. It's obvious to everyone but him that Brunell isn't the answer. 13 points against the Bears when Portis gained 171? C'mon, I understand loyalty, but this is 2 games under 100 yards passing and less than 50% completion percentage. At least Ramsey will be able to do better than that.

Agreed! Although I missed today's game I saw some highlights, Portis, wow! Heck of a game, I heard a commentater say the skin's changed their running scheme a bit, is that true? I did see the highlight of Brunell throwing the ball out of bound's when he had I believe it was Coles wide open down the sideline for a TD, as well I see he gave up another TD, 28 point's in 5 1/2 games, I wonder if that's some kind of record? I am now becoming very incouraged thinking how good we can be with Ramsey in there? He will make play's, and he will only get better, Brunell has to go, we can't afford to drop 1 more game because of his inability at QB, I heard a post game comment that we absolutly dominated this game, if that's true, then it's an absolute joke that the bear's had an opportunity to tie, or beat us, with their last possesion, especially when Portis ran for over 170yds., no more excuses for Brunell, and how he need's a running game, he had one and failed miserably, our defense bailed him out big time!

ouch doggie, maybe brunnel will realize he sucks and fake injury.
Maybe sean taylor will realize he sucks and give him one

We need a time machine to go back to the draft and get Rothlisburger
As long as we have that time machine out we might as well go back a couple years and draft tom brady.

or maybe we could just keep stephen davis and not trade the best corner in the league for another back who doesn't fit the system.

As long as we have that time machine out we might as well go back a couple years and draft tom brady.

or maybe we could just keep stephen davis and not trade the best corner in the league for another back who doesn't fit the system.


Maybe the system needs to fit the running back, like it did today. They totaly changed some of the plays they used Portis on and it showed. They need to adapt the system to Portis like they did today and they will be successfull.

It's not often, but I was praying for an injury.


Who's that guy that smacked Nancy Kerrigan across the leg before the Olympics? We need a guy like that to take care of Brunell.

I don't care who it is or if people are just joking, wishing an injury on someone isn't cool, especially one of our own players.

I don't care who it is or if people are just joking, wishing an injury on someone isn't cool, especially one of our own players.


Sorry, I was just kidding...I would never truly wish any harm to another person. Even if he is the reason we are 2-4.

Bozzy - This Brunell deal is ALL Gibbs. I've actually heard that Snyder didn't want to write that check, but Gibbs is Jesus isn't he?

This game was absolutely pathetic and nothing to get excited for except for Smoot, Washington, Taylor, and Portis (In no particular order). Playcalling was uninspired and boring. It was conservative to a fault. Although there were signs of promise, this offense CAN NOT excel with Mark Brunell at the helm. It's not often, but I was praying for an injury.

I disagree about the playcalling. Gibbs will alwayus be somewhat conservative, but they put in some different running plays more suited for Portis, and they did take some shots down the field. It was all a matter of execution: Portis did, very well I might add, and Brunell simply did not....again.

Yeah I don't think the playcalling was a problem at all yesterday. In fact I thought it was much improved and the schemes were as well. We finally saw Portis getting to the outside on pitches, running out of spread formations and the line blocking similar to what Denver does.