MTK
10-17-2004, 02:30 PM
way too conservative here, we should be trying for at least a FG
Game thread: Bears-SkinsPages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
[38]
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
MTK 10-17-2004, 02:30 PM way too conservative here, we should be trying for at least a FG RedskinRat 10-17-2004, 02:30 PM Betts caught in the backfield for a loss on 3rd. redwagonskins 10-17-2004, 02:30 PM gibbs doesn't trust Brunell. we're sunk if he is our QB against a decent team RedskinRat 10-17-2004, 02:30 PM Prevent offense....I should laugh but it makes me feel ill. It's true. ArringtonRules 10-17-2004, 02:30 PM There's no way that Gibbs would switch QB's in mid game. Not without an injury. Brunell is the ONE who has made the game close, otherwise we r owning these hapless Bears.. He can't afford to sit n give Brunell a chance to give Bears a win.. RAMSEY has to come on.. monk81 10-17-2004, 02:30 PM way too conservative here, we should be trying for at least a FG I agree Matty.................at least try one long pass :coach: NY_Skinsfan 10-17-2004, 02:31 PM Here's another place to listen to the game as well: http://stream2.oglecom.com/wrhl.asx try this redwagonskins 10-17-2004, 02:31 PM better have good punt coverage... Cush 10-17-2004, 02:31 PM decent punt coverage monk81 10-17-2004, 02:31 PM So coaches content to go into half with 3 point lead...if I was the defense I'd be mad............ :madani: | |
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum