Sam Bradford now leads to Redskins

http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/10/28/2010-nfl-mock-database-sam-bradford-leads-to-redskins.html (http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/10/28/2010-nfl-mock-database-sam-bradford-leads-to-redskins.html)

The title of the post is a bit misleading. We did munch the Top 6 picks, but there is far from a consensus in any of the spots. To be declared a consensus pick by the NFL Mock Draft Database (http://dcprosportsreport.com/files/mockdraftdatabase/nfl.html) at least 60% of the mocks must project the same player. None of the Top 6 spots are even close. The NFL Mock Draft Database (http://dcprosportsreport.com/files/mockdraftdatabase/nfl.html) is the largest and most updated Mock Database on the Web. This is our 11th year with the original Mock Draft Database.

http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/11/05/dt-ndamokung-suh-leads-the-top-6-picks-31-mock-drafts-munched.html (http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/11/05/dt-ndamokung-suh-leads-the-top-6-picks-31-mock-drafts-munched.html)

Bradford still leads this week and has picked up mocks.

Now, out of the 31 mocks updated from 10/25 through 11/5, 25 or 80% now project the Redskins to take a QB.

If we get Bradford in the draft the will clearly state that the Redskins haven't changed.

Our first pick is way too valuable for us to use on a QB you SHOULDN'T see the field for an entire year.

Secondly, I don't want the Redskins to being thinking about selecting any player in the draft right now because that would show that Snyder would still be in control of that pick. Let our coach/GM make that selection and please have that pick fit into the confines of a 'overall strategic scheme'.

And who is going to protect Bradford? Tinkerbell? If we draft him and don't address the line with solid players then he will end up like Stafford in Detroit. Hey there is a correlation Bradford, Stafford, scary.

And who is going to protect Bradford? Tinkerbell? If we draft him and don't address the line with solid players then he will end up like Stafford in Detroit. Hey there is a correlation Bradford, Stafford, scary.

And he will end up in IR when he re-injures that shoulder. :doh:

Bradford won't be a good pro IMO.

Draft linemen....it really isn't that hard. If we have a top 5 pick we should trade down to get more picks anyway.

Bradford won't be a good pro IMO.

Draft linemen....it really isn't that hard. If we have a top 5 pick we should trade down to get more picks anyway.

How can u say he won't be a good pro lol?? It's insane how ppl just say random shit about a player they don't even know or watch.. Sam Bradford is respected by all the pro scouts even though that doesn't guarantee he will be a star, it shows everyone that he is worth taking. You were probably the one that said sanchez would be a bum also

How can u say he won't be a good pro lol?? It's insane how ppl just say random shit about a player they don't even know or watch.. Sam Bradford is respected by all the pro scouts even though that doesn't guarantee he will be a star, it shows everyone that he is worth taking. You were probably the one that said sanchez would be a bum also

College QBs are a toss up, for every Peyton Manning or Donovan McNabb, you have a Ryan Leaf, JaMarcus Russell, Joey Harrington, or any first-round bust.

I think before everyone blindly says that we should take a QB in the first, we need to have a good FO that will be making those decisions.

If Snyder hires a good GM that has the reputation/ability to find linemen in the later rounds, then I would be all for getting a QB in the first (although it still bothers me picking up a player that only played a few games during his last season in college because he injured and re-injured the same shoulder).

I'd like to wish our front office luck, but those sorry SOBs wouldn't know what to do with it if they had it.

I took that from the Glengary motivational speech.

College QBs are a toss up, for every Peyton Manning or Donovan McNabb, you have a Ryan Leaf, JaMarcus Russell, Joey Harrington, or any first-round bust.

I think before everyone blindly says that we should take a QB in the first, we need to have a good FO that will be making those decisions.

If Snyder hires a good GM that has the reputation/ability to find linemen in the later rounds, then I would be all for getting a QB in the first (although it still bothers me picking up a player that only played a few games during his last season in college because he injured and re-injured the same shoulder).

I agree with that assesment, but at some point this team has to take a qb again, either draft or fa.. So if we draft one why not take Bradford or clausen I'm the top 10? We can get some quality olineman in the later rounds.