Sherman Lewis, what was his effect

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

Eknox
10-27-2009, 02:23 PM
I thought play calling was way better than Zorn's play calling, if you don't see a difference you weren't watching the game. We passed the ball inside the 20 and we scored, and would have scored more if Rabach doesn't goof off the ball. The offense actually had some flow and rythm to it, what stopped it was J Campbell throwing late OFTEN and fumbling the ball (ARE also) had JC manned up we would have won. I sy kudos to Sherm Lewis he called a very imaginative game that wasn't predictable like when Zorn was calling plays..

GMScud
10-27-2009, 02:29 PM
Play calling wasn't an issue and honestly I didn't see where it impacted things positively or negatively. The main issue is, and has been all year with the execution side of things.

You can call plays directly from a Bill Walsh playbook but it's not going to matter if the players don't go out and do their jobs.

Yup. The line is terrible, and when on occasion they do give JC enough time to look downfield, our god awful receivers don't get open. Maybe that's a Stan Hixon issue? Seems to me there is plenty of physical talent amongst the receivers, but for whatever reason they aren't open. Moss dropping TDs that hit him in the hands doesn't help things either.

I would say that regardless of how the rest of the season plays out, Stan Hixon is among the many who need to be shown the door.

sportscurmudgeon
10-27-2009, 03:24 PM
Play calling wasn't an issue and honestly I didn't see where it impacted things positively or negatively. The main issue is, and has been all year with the execution side of things.

You can call plays directly from a Bill Walsh playbook but it's not going to matter if the players don't go out and do their jobs.




Amen to that... That isn't Jerry Rice and John Taylor out there at WR. That isn't Dwight Clark at TE. That isn't an OL made up of 5 competent NFL players. And that is not Joe Montana/Steve Young under center. As Gruden and Jaws kept pointing out last night, it's the execution - - stupid.

MTK
10-27-2009, 03:43 PM
Yup. The line is terrible, and when on occasion they do give JC enough time to look downfield, our god awful receivers don't get open. Maybe that's a Stan Hixon issue? Seems to me there is plenty of physical talent amongst the receivers, but for whatever reason they aren't open. Moss dropping TDs that hit him in the hands doesn't help things either.

I would say that regardless of how the rest of the season plays out, Stan Hixon is among the many who need to be shown the door.

I don't think it's a Hixon issue at all. I think it's a JC issue when it comes to trying to get the ball down the field to the receivers.

The few rare instances where he does have time, he either rushes through his reads or he doesn't attempt a pass unless a guy is wide freaking open. Who many times do we see him pull the ball back down and dump it off? The MNF crew noted this several times.

Hog1
10-27-2009, 03:45 PM
In two weeks (of prep time) he equaled our best offensive production against the second best team we have played this year. I consider that pretty good? It will be interesting to see what happens over the bye

SantanaTreeMoss
10-27-2009, 03:48 PM
The execution was horrible, just goes to show what the real problem is.

Hog1
10-27-2009, 03:49 PM
I don't think it's a Hixon issue at all. I think it's a JC issue when it comes to trying to get the ball down the field to the receivers.

The few rare instances where he does have time, he either rushes through his reads or he doesn't attempt a pass unless a guy is wide freaking open. Who many times do we see him pull the ball back down and dump it off? The MNF crew noted this several some imes.

JC....obviously cannot operate in this environment. He needs more time, security, etc. Some other QB's can deal with it. However, who is that going to be....that is available? That having been said, if we do the right thing and rebuild the line, that may go a long way to making JC...serviceable. At least until some better QB options become available

SantanaTreeMoss
10-27-2009, 03:51 PM
JC....obviously cannot operate in this environment. He needs more time, security, etc. Some other QB's can deal with it. However, who is that going to be....that is available? That having been said, if we do the right thing and rebuild the line, that may go a long way to making JC...serviceable. At least until some better QB options become available

Agreed, JC does not look comfortable at all. And you could really see this in the first half, he has so much going on around him and I'm sure its impacting his playing. He really has to just calm down and make better decisions.

skinsguy
10-27-2009, 03:52 PM
Let's face it. It's the NFL. Your offensive line is not always going to make it so that you can drop back and wait for a receiver to be wide open before you throw the ball. You are going to get rushed and you're going to get flushed out of the pocket. A good QB is going to know how to operate under pressure and make the plays. JC wasn't making the plays last night. For Pete's sake, he didn't even see a WIDE OPEN Santana Moss.

PortimusPrime
10-27-2009, 03:56 PM
I agree that the O-Line has not caused all of our problems on offense. There are a lot of things that need to be fixed, QB being one of them.

I've had mixed feelings about rather I think we should draft another rookie QB or pick up a FA next year. I do agree that the focus of the draft should be O-Line though.

There should be some mediocre QBs on the FA list next year as either Tavarias Jackson or Sage Rosenfields should be released from the Vikings next year. Jeff Garcia is still available and Quinn or Anderson will be available for trade. Any of these guys are good picks to take over at QB till we can find a franchise QB to take over our offense.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum