Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Panthers)

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13

jgalecpa
10-12-2009, 11:58 AM
The way the current CBA is set up, we can offer him a RFA tender at 120% of his current salary, (which comes to roughly $3 million dollars) and receive compensation for him if he leaves.



Wow.

So to keep him in whatever form, we have to give him a 20% raise?

Outta here.

GTripp0012
10-12-2009, 12:00 PM
Wow.

So to keep him in whatever form, we have to give him a 20% raise?

Outta here.Yeah, which raises him to roughly the salary of Rex Grossman or Todd Collins.

This franchise can't afford that kind of change.

jgalecpa
10-12-2009, 12:02 PM
Yeah, which raises him to roughly the salary of Rex Grossman or Todd Collins.

This franchise can't afford that kind of change.

No kidding.

Looks like we are in for two more rebuilding years, and we all have seen how JC deals with change.

Sucks being us.

Redskin Warrior
10-12-2009, 12:02 PM
Wow.

So to keep him in whatever form, we have to give him a 20% raise?

Outta here.

LOL!!! That's not much at all LOL!!!

JLee9718
10-12-2009, 12:05 PM
Everybody keeps saying Gibbs is great and he could straighten out this mess that he and Vinny put the Redskins in...Nobody is going to win with this offensive line, and that's a fact! Bring on Pete Kendall. And anybody else out there that is half decent at blocking so JC will at least have a chance to throw the ball to somebody...

firstdown
10-12-2009, 12:09 PM
Are you taking about the players or the offensive plays? Sure the run game is quite similar, but it worked a hell of a lot better with Gibbs. Also minus the two-timeout botch, Gibbs did a pretty good job in management.

Also he kept a team together, after a couple terrible starts; I highly doubt Zorn has that ability. If we lose next week the players are going to start giving up on him. We can already see the impacts of the lack of discipline both at Skins park and during games.

Yeah Gibbs player eval did have some flaws, but he got Cooley, Landry, Sean Taylor. I put a decent amount of blame on the FO this year, but Gibbs 2.0 owns Zorn any day IMO.
Are you talking clock management? If so I think you forgot about all the times Gibbs was on the side lines looking like he had no clue what to do and all the post here saying the games has passed him by. I love Gibbs but the game had passed him by.

SmootSmack
10-12-2009, 12:13 PM
Everybody keeps saying Gibbs is great and he could straighten out this mess that he and Vinny put the Redskins in...Nobody is going to win with this offensive line, and that's a fact! Bring on Pete Kendall. And anybody else out there that is half decent at blocking so JC will at least have a chance to throw the ball to somebody...

It was kind of bizarre that Mike Williams who has started at T in the NFL played Right Guard for us yesterday, while D'Anthony Batiste, who has started at RG in the NFL played LT for us yesterday. Bizarre...or ass-backwards. However you want to look at it.

I suppose if Rinehart wasn't hurt then Williams would have slid in at RT and Heyer would have shifted to LT. But then again if Rhino wasn't hurt, then Big Mike probably wouldn't have been active.

All that said though, what about Will Montgomery (or Armstrong as the informed fans call him)? Maybe I missed it, but I don't think he was inactive. And I thought the whole reason of not starting him was his versatility. Why didn't he step in at guard, slide Big Mike over to RT where he has started and move Heyer over to LT yesterday when Samuels went down? Heyer is no great shakes at left tackle, but at least he has experience on that side.

GTripp0012
10-12-2009, 12:22 PM
All that said though, what about Will Montgomery (or Armstrong as the informed fans call him)? Maybe I missed it, but I don't think he was inactive. And I thought the whole reason of not starting him was his versatility. Why didn't he step in at guard, slide Big Mike over to RT where he has started and move Heyer over to LT yesterday when Samuels went down? Heyer is no great shakes at left tackle, but at least he has experience on that side.He was inactive.

Only Batiste (and maybe Edwin Williams?) was active but not starting yesterday.

It's kind of amazing that whenever Zorn has severely understaffed his OL over the past two years, Samuels has gotten hurt. But then again, that's pretty much all Zorn's fault for not being prepared.

warriorzpath
10-12-2009, 12:25 PM
Everybody keeps saying Gibbs is great and he could straighten out this mess that he and Vinny put the Redskins in...Nobody is going to win with this offensive line, and that's a fact! Bring on Pete Kendall. And anybody else out there that is half decent at blocking so JC will at least have a chance to throw the ball to somebody...

I think Gibbs would probably have found a way to straighten out this mess eventually. This team seems to be falling apart more and more as time goes on, instead of better. The problem with Gibbs's recent coaching stint was - his offensive style of game was boring and too predictable.

SmootSmack
10-12-2009, 12:41 PM
He was inactive.

Only Batiste (and maybe Edwin Williams?) was active but not starting yesterday.

It's kind of amazing that whenever Zorn has severely understaffed his OL over the past two years, Samuels has gotten hurt. But then again, that's pretty much all Zorn's fault for not being prepared.

Are you sure? I thought Williams was inactive, but not Will Montgomery.

Here's Reid's list

Redskins Insider - Rinehart Out, Mike Williams In (with Inactives) (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/rinehart-out-mike-williams-in.html)

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum