Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?

Pages : 1 2 [3] 4

WaldSkins
10-09-2009, 09:20 PM
How bout Wynn AND Betts

SmootSmack
10-09-2009, 10:51 PM
I would think Wynn or Alridge. Wynn seems more expendable particularly with Jarmon starting to come along, but wiith Montgomery out at least two more weeks and Griffin possibly out this SUnday (and maybe longer) they might need to start looking at Daniels playing more minutes inside...so does that mean Wynn is activated? Probably not actually.

I could see them possibly cutting Alridge and then hoping to re-sign him once they cut Pakulak. But I suspect one reason they might be trying out all these running backs is in case they cut Alridge but are unable to re-sign him.

GMScud
10-09-2009, 10:55 PM
I would think Wynn or Alridge. Wynn seems more expendable particularly with Jarmon starting to come along, but wiith Montgomery out at least two more weeks and Griffin possibly out this SUnday (and maybe longer) they might need to start looking at Daniels playing more minutes inside...so does that mean Wynn is activated? Probably not actually.

I could see them possibly cutting Alridge and then hoping to re-sign him once they cut Pakulak. But I suspect one reason they might be trying out all these running backs is in case they cut Alridge but are unable to re-sign him.

I don't understand why Wynn made the 53 man if he's going to be inactive every week. If we're going to keep a guy only to have him inactive on game day, why not a young talent we're trying to develop (a la Rinehart last year)?? No point on having a guy in the twilight of his career on the inactive list every damn Sunday.

SFREDSKIN
10-10-2009, 12:20 AM
I don't understand why Wynn made the 53 man if he's going to be inactive every week. If we're going to keep a guy only to have him inactive on game day, why not a young talent we're trying to develop (a la Rinehart last year)?? No point on having a guy in the twilight of his career on the inactive list every damn Sunday.

Could have had Rob Jackson on the roster instead.

mrreddman
10-10-2009, 09:04 AM
Told you guys from the day we signed him..Wynn sucks and was a wasted roster spot. Cut him now please.

CultBrennan59
10-10-2009, 12:29 PM
hopefully wynn

WaldSkins
10-10-2009, 01:28 PM
Could have had Rob Jackson on the roster instead.

Or Dixon

KLHJ2
10-10-2009, 01:33 PM
I think that Dan and Vinny are reading this thread waiting to see the consensus after about 50 replies before they make their decision today. Maybe the mods can help them out and add a pole because the suspense is killing me.

JLee9718
10-10-2009, 01:43 PM
I would cut Wynn.

JGisLordOfTheRings
10-10-2009, 01:52 PM
I think that Dan and Vinny are reading this thread waiting to see the consensus after about 50 replies before they make their decision today. Maybe the mods can help them out and add a pole because the suspense is killing me.


Probably true.

Thread needs poll obv

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum