|
Monkeydad 10-05-2009, 11:24 AM UPDATED stats/assessment:
Cutler:
WK 4 - 18/28 (64.3%), 141 yds, 2 TD, 0 INTS, 100.4 rating, 8 rush yds
TOTAL: 83/129 (64.3%), 901 yds, 8 TD, 5 INT, 89.3 rating, 22 rush yds
Sanchez:
WK 4 - 14/27 (51.9%), 138 yds, 0 TD, 3 INT, 27.0 rating, 24 rush yds
TOTAL: 63/110 (57.3%), 744 yds, 4 TD, 5 INT, 71.2 rating, 38 rush yds
Campbell:
WK 4 - 12/22 (54.5%), 170 yds, 2 TD, 3 INT, 70.5 rating, 20 rush yds
TOTAL: 81/124 (65.3%), 963 yds, 5 TD, 5 INT, 85.5 rating, 85 rush yds
Ranks:
Comp. % = Campell, Cutler, Sanchez
Yds = Campell (963), Cutler (901), Sanchez (744)
TDs = Cutler (8), Campbell (5), Sanchez (4)
INTs = Campbell/Cutler/Sanchez (5 ea)
QB rating = Cutler (89.3), Campbell (85.5), Sanchez (71.2)
Rush yds = Campbell (85), Sanchez(38), Cutler (22)
Campbell, despite tehe bad half in the TB game, is still leading all three QBs in most categories. All QBs have an equal 5 INTs. He has more yards than Cutler and Sanchez, both in the air and on the ground. If he did not have those couple of TDs dropped earlier in the season, he'd be even with Cutler on TDs and ahead on Rating, the only two categories he's not leading. The 3 INTs vs. TB is not typical Campbell play, as he's usually one of the best QBs in the NFL at NOT throwing INTs. That performance will be an anomaly this season and he'll finish with far less INTs thrown than the other two QBs we're comparing. Also, despite a weak-looking stat line, he led all three QBs in production in Week 4. Against the same Lions team, Cambell had 200 MORE YARDS than Cutler.
dmek25 10-05-2009, 12:00 PM OK, ill bite. why cant Campbell throw more touchdown passes? is it him, or the talent around him? i know, the old chicken and the egg. and i do like you continuing to post these numbers
OK, ill bite. why cant Campbell throw more touchdown passes? is it him, or the talent around him? i know, the old chicken and the egg. and i do like you continuing to post these numbers
He could easily have a few more if it weren't for some drops
warriorzpath 10-05-2009, 12:12 PM This is a good win for campbell. Let's hope that the 3rd quarter of that game was the start of campbell's consistency.
dmvskinzfan08 10-05-2009, 12:15 PM UPDATED stats/assessment:
Cutler:
WK 4 - 18/28 (64.3%), 141 yds, 2 TD, 0 INTS, 100.4 rating, 8 rush yds
TOTAL: 83/129 (64.3%), 901 yds, 8 TD, 5 INT, 89.3 rating, 22 rush yds
Sanchez:
WK 4 - 14/27 (51.9%), 138 yds, 0 TD, 3 INT, 27.0 rating, 24 rush yds
TOTAL: 63/110 (57.3%), 744 yds, 4 TD, 5 INT, 71.2 rating, 38 rush yds
Campbell:
WK 4 - 12/22 (54.5%), 170 yds, 2 TD, 3 INT, 70.5 rating, 20 rush yds
TOTAL: 81/124 (65.3%), 963 yds, 5 TD, 5 INT, 85.5 rating, 85 rush yds
Ranks:
Comp. % = Campell, Cutler, Sanchez
Yds = Campell (963), Cutler (901), Sanchez (744)
TDs = Cutler (8), Campbell (5), Sanchez (4)
INTs = Campbell/Cutler/Sanchez (5 ea)
QB rating = Cutler (89.3), Campbell (85.5), Sanchez (71.2)
Rush yds = Campbell (85), Sanchez(38), Cutler (22)
Campbell, despite tehe bad half in the TB game, is still leading all three QBs in most categories. All QBs have an equal 5 INTs. He has more yards than Cutler and Sanchez, both in the air and on the ground. If he did not have those couple of TDs dropped earlier in the season, he'd be even with Cutler on TDs and ahead on Rating, the only two categories he's not leading. The 3 INTs vs. TB is not typical Campbell play, as he's usually one of the best QBs in the NFL at NOT throwing INTs. That performance will be an anomaly this season and he'll finish with far less INTs thrown than the other two QBs we're comparing. Also, despite a weak-looking stat line, he led all three QBs in production in Week 4. Against the same Lions team, Cambell had 200 MORE YARDS than Cutler.
I am sure the JC haters will totally ignore this..lol. Only way they wont hate is if we win the Suepr Bowl. Then they still might hate..lol. All they will say is he is a horrible QB. He sucks. Blah blah blah. The will totally dismiss stats. I think DS and Vinny created this monster by their offseason antics. Which shoulnd't have happened unless they were absolutely sure tehy were getting one of these QBs which in my opinion are not that much better than Campbell if they are at all. But people will hate JC regardless...
I kinda like the fact JC struggled but still found a way to make enough plays to help win the game. Stuff like that helps build character and it also helps build trust from his teammates. I know to a lot of fans it was simply a bad day for him, but I think in the locker room he won some new fans yesterday.
dmvskinzfan08 10-05-2009, 12:20 PM I kinda like the fact JC struggled but still found a way to make enough plays to help win the game. Stuff like that helps build character and it also helps build trust from his teammates. I know to a lot of fans it was simply a bad day for him, but I think in the locker room he won some new fans yesterday.
Better yet it helps him loosen up and not be afraid to take chances. Like I said earlier, Cutler had the green light to let it fly since day one. JC is just getting the green light instead of managing a game and playing scared Zorn has given him the opportunity to let it rip. This might be what the doctor order. Look for more deep balls next week and a more attacking style...
FRPLG 10-05-2009, 12:21 PM I kinda like the fact JC struggled but still found a way to make enough plays to help win the game. Stuff like that helps build character and it also helps build trust from his teammates. I know to a lot of fans it was simply a bad day for him, but I think in the locker room he won some new fans yesterday.
I loved it...we got a win and that's what matters. So taking the entire game and effort into account I feel better about JC than I did before. Even though he had his worst stats day ever. No one can tell me that what he did yesterday was all bad and the good things were good things we hadn't yet seen from him. It was huge to me.
warriorzpath 10-05-2009, 12:34 PM I kinda like the fact JC struggled but still found a way to make enough plays to help win the game. Stuff like that helps build character and it also helps build trust from his teammates. I know to a lot of fans it was simply a bad day for him, but I think in the locker room he won some new fans yesterday.
Exactly, he led by example. He came back even though the game (and the whole season) was going down the drains. Talk about handling pressure. NOW you know that you can trust that he has the ability to lead you out of darkness.
As much as the redskins were down last week, the lowest point in the last few years definitely must have been halftime with this last game with tampa bay. After being beaten by the worst team (lions) in history (in terms of losses), the team is being beaten by another winless team with a new coach and new qb at the half. And there seemed no hope at that point for the game and the season. Then campbell LEADS them back.
Stats and X's and O's are cool to analyze and all that, but this is where the game is at - the heart of the game is the emotions, leaders, and all of that - that some of you seem to disregard as cliche. This is what I was referring to, back in preseason about pressure. You either let it crush you or you use it to motivate yourself and focus at what's important. To me, this is the best game that Campbell's played all season, maybe his whole nfl career up to this point because of the situation and everyone's hopes and emotions that were riding on this one game alone.
I think if the redskins would have lost this game, they would have dug themselves a hole with their emotions and confidence that probably would be have been too deep to come back from.
CultBrennan59 10-05-2009, 12:48 PM You need to go get a life and go post on the Colts blog. Your opinions dont carry any weight here because you are not a true fan. You are here to just start BS with your meaningless statements. Go root on your Colts and stay the F-away from us real Redskins fans. :Flush:
You can't say I'm not a true fan, wanting my team to do good for next year. I want us to do bad so we get a high draft pick, and not a mid round pick,which is what I see us getting.
|