Bigger waste of money?

Gibbs or Brunell? Gibbs was brought in to win. After we lose to Baltimore, we are 1-4. Spurrier WOULD have a better record than this. We bring in an aging QB to win immediately, though we have a compenent, young, raw QB, and we are 1-4.

I would say Brunell since a coaches salary doesnt count against the cap

Should I just lock this thread now?

Gibbs or Brunell? Gibbs was brought in to win. After we lose to Baltimore, we are 1-4. Spurrier WOULD have a better record than this. We bring in an aging QB to win immediately, though we have a compenent, young, raw QB, and we are 1-4.

I would say Brunell since a coaches salary doesnt count against the cap


Matty, please delete the post above.....thank you.

you guys all think Gibbs is God, so i guess I am speaking blasemely eh?

you guys all think Gibbs is God, so i guess I am speaking blasemely eh?

Pretty much. :stop: That's why I've been saying it's Brunell.

In case anyone forgot, Spurrier QUIT, he didn't want to be here so I don't see how you can say he'd be doing a better job. Regardless of who we ended up hiring, Spurrier wasn't going to be here so it's a non-issue.

i think ive just accepted the fact that gibbs isnt what he used to be, and you guys have not. the playcalling is awful, challenges awful, we consistenly shoot ourselves in our foot. this is all poor coaching. we have talent, and dont utilize it.

you guys all think Gibbs is God, so i guess I am speaking blasemely eh?

Zack your saying that a HOF coach is the reason why we're losing......and that hasn't been the case...it's the players

1-4

i really wish we would have got denny green. in fact, at the time gibbs was hired, i still kinda wanted him. the cards have the same record and we have twice the talent