|
|
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
[ 15]
16
17
18
19
20
21
redsk1 12-09-2009, 10:03 AM Was @ Oak is a big “draft order” game this weekend. This could all be moot if we win a couple of our final games, which is realistic. The key games are not all this weekend, but from now til the end of the year.
1 W: Cleve, TB, ST Louis
2 W’s: Detroit (Chic @ Det, if Det wins and we lose out, then we move up)
3 W’s: KC, Was
4 W’s: Buff, Oak,
Key Games:
Buf @ KC , Cle @ KC
Was @ Oak
Chi @ Det
Not rooting for a loss this week, but if we do lose, we’ll get draft tiebreakers over Oak, KC due to head to head. All this will sort itself out soon enough. I’m guessing we end up about 7th or 8th.
I’m planning on a Cowboys win at home. Bank on it.
diehardskin2982 12-09-2009, 02:25 PM I hope it plays out like this
Round 1 Russell Okung
Round 1 (trade next years 1 and 5th) Colt McCoy
Round 2 Ryan Mathews
If this happened I would be estatic
Lotus 12-09-2009, 02:39 PM Was @ Oak is a big “draft order” game this weekend. This could all be moot if we win a couple of our final games, which is realistic. The key games are not all this weekend, but from now til the end of the year.
1 W: Cleve, TB, ST Louis
2 W’s: Detroit (Chic @ Det, if Det wins and we lose out, then we move up)
3 W’s: KC, Was
4 W’s: Buff, Oak,
Key Games:
Buf @ KC , Cle @ KC
Was @ Oak
Chi @ Det
Not rooting for a loss this week, but if we do lose, we’ll get draft tiebreakers over Oak, KC due to head to head. All this will sort itself out soon enough. I’m guessing we end up about 7th or 8th.
I’m planning on a Cowboys win at home. Bank on it.
Draft tiebreakers are done according to strength of schedule, not head-to-head.
redsk1 12-09-2009, 03:06 PM Draft tiebreakers are done according to strength of schedule, not head-to-head.
Gotcha, I guess we wouldn't win the tiebreakers then.
diehardskin2982 12-09-2009, 04:32 PM I thought it was a coin flip
Big C 12-09-2009, 05:32 PM I hope it plays out like this
Round 1 Russell Okung
Round 1 (trade next years 1 and 5th) Colt McCoy
Round 2 Ryan Mathews
If this happened I would be estatic
i would be very unhappy if we traded a future 1st to get mccoy.
Big C 12-09-2009, 05:34 PM I've been pimping Suh for a couple months now, not going to stop. The kid is sick. Him and AH = No pocket.
I realize we need a lot of OL help, but Id rather get a steal with Suh than a reach for the best T.
im with you, im a VT grad so I saw him dominate the line there and ever since. that combo imo is too good to pass up. i also believe we might be reaching to take okung in the top 5 if thats where we went.
diehardskin2982 12-09-2009, 06:29 PM i would be very unhappy if we traded a future 1st to get mccoy.
we are going to get a QB in this years draft. In this scenario we would get the best Tackle available and a decent QB, why don't you like this?
Big C 12-09-2009, 06:37 PM we are going to get a QB in this years draft. In this scenario we would get the best Tackle available and a decent QB, why don't you like this?
id be unhappy for several reasons. first, i dont like mccoy, i do not think he will be a good pro. second, if we did get him, i sure wouldnt want to trade away a future 1st rounder to get him, as I dont think hes even worthy of a 1st round pick. third, if we do go QB, id much rather have clausen who would be my first choice, bradford, locker, tebow...again thats just my opinion.
wilsowilso 12-09-2009, 06:44 PM Round 1 (trade next years 1 and 5th) Colt McCoy
Trading up for another first rounder is expensive.
A fifth round pick? It would cost way more than that.
Also McCoy stinks IMO.
|