RedSkins QB's

Many a QB or 1 Joe Gibbs?

well the point of his videos is many qbs, ignoring Joe Gibbs would be imbecilic, and I would hate to call any poster on here that ;)

well the point of his videos is many qbs, ignoring Joe Gibbs would be imbecilic, and I would hate to call any poster on here that ;)

Think it could be a better post if he set up the videos with a few words on why he posted them. But to name it RedSkins QB's and then just post videos of Redskins QB's that we all know played on the team is kinda pointless.

dmv clearly you are not using the 1st kind of intelligence, but rather the 2nd. It is all clear if we lose the ego in our society and seek enlightenment of mind body soul, then no words would need to be said, but each, by the greatness of that which is, would be refreshed and rejoice among the community of the brethren of that which is the Redskins QBs.

Or put another way, yes it is pointless. but still good videos

I am trying to figure that out myself. I absolutely hated Jay Shroeder when I was younger. Could't stand him.

But as someone stated earlier. It was more about Gibbs than the QBs. I think that is what Zorn needs to learn. Gibbs was a motivator and also knew how to use his players and make game plans for his personnel and also he made good half time adjustments. Anyways. Can someone kill this thread. I think we all have access to YouTube

Post = Fail
More about Gibbs? Sorry jack, but a coach is only as great as the players he has around him. Gibbs II wasn't so great now was it? Thing is the first time around he had players that wanted to win from a bygone era and a FO that was second to none. Pretty hard to lose with that combo.

dmv clearly you are not using the 1st kind of intelligence, but rather the 2nd. It is all clear if we lose the ego in our society and seek enlightenment of mind body soul, then no words would need to be said, but each, by the greatness of that which is, would be refreshed and rejoice among the community of the brethren of that which is the redskins qbs.

Or put another way, yes it is pointless. But still good videos

Okay enough of the Esoteric teachings.

Yes they are good videos. but atleast set them up with a short paragraph. Or a better title. "Successful QBs under Gibbs" or something that states why he posted the videos.

Oh yeah not to mention an unlimited war chest.

dmv clearly you are not using the 1st kind of intelligence, but rather the 2nd. It is all clear if we lose the ego in our society and seek enlightenment of mind body soul, then no words would need to be said, but each, by the greatness of that which is, would be refreshed and rejoice among the community of the brethren of that which is the Redskins QBs.

Or put another way, yes it is pointless. but still good videos

:laughing- I thought I understood that for a minute and it scared the s**t out of me.

I cant say much seeing as im still a camp scrubber but its a little thread happy...i was looking for a thread on who could our future qb should we give up on JC but this was outta left field

man i remember that 86 team that lost to the giants 3 TIMES.

More about Gibbs? Sorry jack, but a coach is only as great as the players he has around him. Gibbs II wasn't so great now was it? Thing is the first time around he had players that wanted to win from a bygone era and a FO that was second to none. Pretty hard to lose with that combo.


Umm. Do you remember the strike year?

Okay then..He may have had some good players. But Gibbs was known to make his players better. His players didn't make him. He put them in positions where they could succeed.

I guess no other players in the NFL during that era on other teams wanted to win either..

We have talented players now. Are we winning? Are you a Gibbs hater? One of those people not thankful for him bringing us 3 superbowls just because his second coming fell short. If so I dont repsect you as a Redskins fan. Maybe you should cheer for the Lions since you are in Detroit. This isn't about all the players. The title is Redskins QB's. The ones under Gibbs weren't that great. They were good. Gibbs is in the hall of fame. Besides Theisman. The rest were good but not great (under Gibbs). But they maintained the game and played hard. Occasionally having great games. Which is no knock on them at all. But to say it was all about the players and not Gibbs is suspect