Pimp the poll: Which player is in biggest roster trouble

Pages : 1 [2] 3

SmootSmack
08-26-2009, 04:25 PM
One player who I think is safe is Reed Doughty, he has been outstanding and Kareem Moore hasn't so far. I hope to keep Moore as I like him, but would not be surprised if he was let go in a shocker move. Renaldo Wynn is the other.

I think they'll keep both Doughty and Moore

jrsz24
08-26-2009, 04:32 PM
Suisam

JLW428
08-26-2009, 04:39 PM
Not to dig up the past but, where are all of those that were calling for JCs head and praying for Colt to start by the 4th game??

I like his as a person, but he is gone.

tryfuhl
08-26-2009, 04:52 PM
Jason Reid thinks the Skins have invested too much into Big Mike to let him go. Of those listed, i think Brennan is the most in trouble.


I'm trying to think of what we've invested in him other than just an opportunity and welcoming; we pretty much did it as a favor to Dockery.

GridIron26
08-26-2009, 05:07 PM
I voted M. Williams.. Even though he's like 29 years old and a vet, but is he not eligible for PS? I don't think he has ever been on one before, if so which should makes him to be eligible for it? It might not be an ideal and will be sort of embarrassing for him but I think this would be the best situation for both Redskins and him?

I just don't think we should risk it and sign E. Williams to PS, since Bugel believes that he's doing good.. We lost Crummey to Bengal, who was going to be an replacement for one of our men.. We cannot continue to lose our replacements..

Lotus
08-26-2009, 05:16 PM
I said Big Mike because of all of the reports out of camp which said that he could not block anyone at all. No one expected him to be Jonathan Ogden out of the blocks but if you can't really block anyone, you are of no use. Further, I do not understand the comments about having too much invested in him. He came in out of nowhere for a minimal salary; it's not like we spent a lot of money or training effort on him, as we have with Colt, Devin, or Tryon.

SmootSmack
08-26-2009, 05:19 PM
I voted M. Williams.. Even though he's like 29 years old and a vet, but is he not eligible for PS? I don't think he has ever been on one before, if so which should makes him to be eligible for it? It might not be an ideal and will be sort of embarrassing for him but I think this would be the best situation for both Redskins and him?

I just don't think we should risk it and sign E. Williams to PS, since Bugel believes that he's doing good.. We lost Crummey to Bengal, who was going to be an replacement for one of our men.. We cannot continue to lose our replacements..

He's not eligible. He was like a 3 and a half year starter for the Bills

KLHJ2
08-26-2009, 05:20 PM
:pffff: Mike Williams, he is the only "non Vinny draft pick".

On another note, I cannot believe how many people actully think that Chase Daniel is going to win a roster spot over PJ5. It is just laughable. Chase Daniel had 1 ok performance this preseason. PJ5 had 2 last preseason. Not to mention the fact that he did not play that poorly against the Ravens considering that he was playing with no oline help. This last game he was doing well before the pick. Their are 2 preseason games left we'll see. If PJ5 gets cut, I will change my Avatar. :silly:

MTK
08-26-2009, 06:11 PM
I'm trying to think of what we've invested in him other than just an opportunity and welcoming; we pretty much did it as a favor to Dockery.

Certainly not $$, he's got no bonus so he can be gone like a fart in the wind.

I read what Reid said and I'm not buying that he's sure to make the team at all.

Trample the Elderly
08-26-2009, 06:34 PM
Mike Williams.

You really don't lose anything if you cut him. I don't think he's impressed Buges. He has raved about Montgomery, E.Williams, and Rinehart, but has said very little about Mike.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum