GTripp0012
08-21-2009, 05:36 PM
What's the probability of a losing a 7th round WR from the PS? Probably pretty slim.True, but, if he's a draft pick that goes on the PS, he's probably not in the future plans.
Clinton Portis Loves Marko MitchellGTripp0012 08-21-2009, 05:36 PM What's the probability of a losing a 7th round WR from the PS? Probably pretty slim.True, but, if he's a draft pick that goes on the PS, he's probably not in the future plans. dmvskinzfan08 08-21-2009, 05:41 PM Need a point of clarification. Is this your suggested depth chart, or what the depth chart actually is? Suggested at this point on the official depth chart on Redskins.com is as follows: Depth Chart - Washington Redskins (http://www.redskins.com/gen/team/depthChart.jsp) Hackett and Hagans are above Marko Mitchell. I for one don't want another tip toe burgular (S. Alexander) episode (seattle connections). Might call this one alligator arm souffle (T.J. Hackett)...lmao - Just kidding. Whatever reason he is not talented enough to stay on a team.... We need to build on youth. Not journeymen. If they were that good they would not be journeymen. I am supporter of UVA and MD prospects. Just not Hagans as a WR.. GTripp0012 08-21-2009, 05:47 PM Suggested at this point on the official depth chart on Redskins.com is as follows: Depth Chart - Washington Redskins (http://www.redskins.com/gen/team/depthChart.jsp) Hackett and Hagans are above Marko Mitchell. I for one don't want another tip toe burgular (S. Alexander) episode (seattle connections). Might call this one alligator arm souffle (T.J. Hackett)...lmao - Just kidding. Whatever reason he is not talented enough to stay on a team.... We need to build on youth. Not journeymen. If they were that good they would not be journeymen. I am supporter of UVA and MD prospects. Just not Hagans as a WR..The depth chart doesn't tell you who is/isn't likely to be cut, it just tells you who is in line for playing time pending their making of the team. Marko Mitchell could make the team based on his draft pick status, and then not play much offense in deference to Hackett. But Hackett and Hagans are both way more likely to be cut. dmvskinzfan08 08-21-2009, 05:49 PM Just my take.....everyone seems enamored with Hackett and Hagens, I'm not. Hackett has spent 5 yrs in the league already and has failed to be a star. He's filled in nicely for teams, and knows the system but is not a major leader or staple of any team which is why he has been let previously. Hagens has 2 yrs in the league and to be honest I see him as another Hackett. His name excapes me, I've never heard of him before. He is 5ft 10inch's so my personal feeling is if we were to be stuck with someone 5-10 I'd rather have Eloi if he can actually catch. Only cause he's reported to have similar speed to Moss but younger which in my book speaks of Moss's future replacement. Possibly. How sweet it would be to have 4 young WR's (Thomas, Kelly, Mitchell, and Eloi) with a mix of speed and hight to compliment Moss and ARE. Hagans was a QB in college that was coverted to a WR/Slash player because of his height. He was a starter at UVA and did fairly well. But by no means is he or should be on our roster. We should put Eloi on the practice squad but Marko needs to be the 5th receiver. dmvskinzfan08 08-21-2009, 05:57 PM The depth chart doesn't tell you who is/isn't likely to be cut, it just tells you who is in line for playing time pending their making of the team. Marko Mitchell could make the team based on his draft pick status, and then not play much offense in deference to Hackett. But Hackett and Hagans are both way more likely to be cut. Umm exactly. That's my point. So the depth chart had Hagans and Hackett for more playing time as far as the depth chart goes. Zorn better not play favorites with Hackett. We already made that mistake with Alexander.. So to me the depth chart reflects their opinions on each WR. Its sort of like an unoffical rank until cuts are made. Maybe feelings have changed since they made the depth chart. I hope so.. tryfuhl 08-21-2009, 06:20 PM What's the probability of a losing a 7th round WR from the PS? Probably pretty slim. Teams have lost undrafted players, including us dmvskinzfan08 08-21-2009, 07:28 PM Teams have lost undrafted players, including us Huh? We drafted him. Not getting this statement. With out the "un" maybe..lol DIRTEE 08-21-2009, 08:09 PM Huh? We drafted him. Not getting this statement. With out the "un" maybe..lol He was trying to say that if teams could lose undrafted players to another team, a 7th rounder could easily be picked up by another team. Redskins8588 08-21-2009, 09:02 PM The way I see it, wasn't it Portis that chewed off Gibbs ear about Sean Taylor??? Apparently the guy knows talent when he sees it... I am just sayin.... SouperMeister 08-21-2009, 09:05 PM Umm exactly. That's my point. So the depth chart had Hagans and Hackett for more playing time as far as the depth chart goes. Zorn better not play favorites with Hackett. We already made that mistake with Alexander.. So to me the depth chart reflects their opinions on each WR. Its sort of like an unoffical rank until cuts are made. Maybe feelings have changed since they made the depth chart. I hope so..If Hackett makes the team and Mitchell gets plucked from the practice squad, Zorn better pray that Marko doesn't become the next Colston for somebody else. | |
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum