We are not below the radar according to Warren Sapp.

Pages : [1] 2 3 4

NYCskinfan82
08-19-2009, 10:52 AM
C.J., West Chester 04:05 PM ET
Hey Warren! The Eagles were a super bowl contender BEFORE Vick, so what does that mean now? I'm thinking Patriots-Eagles Super Bowl this year, your thoughts? Thanks man

Warren Sapp, NFL Network
Patriots? Yes. Eagles? Fifth on my list of the NFC teams. I have Minnesota, Washington, Atlanta and Cardinals.

NYCskinfan82
08-19-2009, 11:02 AM
Please take away one of the l from below.

I've found one NFL analyst who thinks we should be good.

jdlea
08-19-2009, 11:04 AM
Link?

Clearly this is fabricated because the media hates the Redskins.

Or because Warren Sapp and hasn't been exposed to all of the necessary haters yet.

/sarcasm

johno
08-19-2009, 11:11 AM
Link?

Clearly this is fabricated because the media hates the Redskins.

Or because Warren Sapp and hasn't been exposed to all of the necessary haters yet.

/sarcasm

:lol: haha yeah sapp must have a screw loose. i think he is right about the eagles though, they arent that much better than before.

NYCskinfan82
08-19-2009, 11:12 AM
I no good with a Computer don't know how to do that link stuff found it on NFL WS unplugged.

Monkeydad
08-19-2009, 11:13 AM
Eagles were NOT a SB contender before Vick. Other than Peters who is injured and maybe McCoy at backup RB, they downgraded a ton of positions in offseason losses of Dawkins, Shepherd and others. They've lost their defensive leader and their line is already in shambles.

Vick only adds distractions.

ArtMonkDrillz
08-19-2009, 11:14 AM
Link?

Clearly this is fabricated because the media hates the Redskins.

Or because Warren Sapp and hasn't been exposed to all of the necessary haters yet.

/sarcasmI'm picturing Sapp strapped to a chair with his eyes pried open like in A Clockwork Orange. He's being forced to watch anti-Redskin propaganda while "Hail To The Redskins" is played backwards a full volume.

I'd like to know if he said this before or after our 1st preseason game because it seems like a lot of people are putting more stock into that than they probably should.
Either way, I like where his head is at. On paper, so take that for what its worth, we seem to be built for success now that we should have a GREAT defense and an offense that should be able to run the ball well and limit turnovers.

freddyg12
08-19-2009, 11:24 AM
Sapp was a DT, so maybe he's overvaluing his position & predicting we'll be a contender because we got a beast DT.

I think every commentator is looking for that dark horse team to throw out there in august, then say in Dec.; "remember, I picked them & no one else did." The Skins are a good dark horse pick IMO, but I honestly can't say at this point we should expect to be 1 or 2 in the division. The NFC east is shaping up to be so brutal that the last place team will be better than a couple division winners.

heybigstar
08-19-2009, 11:42 AM
Until our offense shows it can be score some points (and its been many years), its tough to call us a contender, IMO.

53Fan
08-19-2009, 11:54 AM
Oh ye of little faith. :rofl: The Super Bowl is ours for the taking. :woot:

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum