What Michael Vick won't be

Donte's situation wasn't quite as black and white as that

True. Leonard Little on the other hand ....

Stallworth didn't go to court to defend himself even though he likely could have come out of without any criminal charges.

As far as I know, he killed, tortured and abused more dogs than the redskins did, also.

And probably did more jail time than the Redskins too.

True. Leonard Little on the other hand ....

Preach

As far as I know, he killed, tortured and abused more dogs than the redskins did, also.

Be careful. I'm sure Vick isn't the only player that took part in dogfighting.

Be careful. I'm sure Vick isn't the only player that took part in dogfighting.

Innocent until proven guilty, and even then we haven't even gotten a hint of any other players being involved in dog fighting though I bet that there are more then a handful that show up and bet on matches. It would be much harder to find someone that handled their own executions personally like Vick did.

Most of Vicks pounding is because of his style of play not his line. Your also wrong about why Vick became the starter.

the blitz is what has been killing him in the last few games,thats not a style of play,thats an off line issue.I could be wrong about why he was named the starter,my memory is not that great anymore,I thought that was one of Reids excuses when he was being so wishy washy on who to choose

And probably did more jail time than the Redskins too.

I'd still take him. But unfortunately for us, the one thing Vick will never be, is a Redskin.

No argument.

If Vick had done what did to human beings rather than to dogs, he would never have seen the light of day. If Vick had hit a dog while driving drunk, he would likely have suffered no criminal ramifications.

As for Stallworth, you'll get no argument from me. Stallworth, however, is not being recast as the victim. etc. etc.

I disagree with you. For some reason our country is preoccupied with giving animals rights that go above and beyond those of a human being.

if Michael Vick had killed a person, even if it were murder, he would not have near as bad as a rep right now. For some reason people dont care when people kill other people, but the fact that he did crimes against dogs, make him the scum of the earth in peoples mind. Why?? Show me where else on planet earth do they put animal rights above those of a human being.

Stallworth killed a man, accident or no accident, DRUNK DRIVING that results in someone's death is still criminal, and in some states can actually be considered negligent homicide.

So the bottom line is, Vick was punished far beyond the normal limits when someone commits a crime against a person. and i think thats messed up.

Apples and oranges people. You can't directly compare Vick with Stallworth. Different circumstances and laws. It's not as simple as saying Stallworth killed a person, Vick killed dogs, why did Stallworth get off easier?

The case against him was bigger than just the fact he killed some dogs.

What ultimately got Vick into really hot water was his failure to fully cooperate with the federal investigation and then failed a drug test while awaiting trial.

He was operating and financing an interstate dog fighting ring that involved gambling and drugs. Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act he could have faced much more severe penalties.