|
KI Skins Fan 07-25-2009, 01:32 PM Does anyone think that the Skins focused too much on improving the defense and not enough on improving the offense during the off-season?
We added AH, signed Hall to a long-term deal, drafted Orakpo, Barnes, and Jarmon, plus we added a few more defensive players, as well.
Personally, I don't have a problem with it because I happen to know that if the other teams can't score on us then they can't beat us. It sticks in my mind that the Ravens won a Super Bowl with what was, at best, a mediocre offense - but they also had a great defense. I think our defense has a chance to dominate this season and, if they do, we could go a long way in the playoffs.
I suppose that the big questions gnawing at most of us concern the offensive side of the ball. For example, I wonder if we should have gone after a top OT in the off-season.
Yet, I'm content with loading up on defense because that's where the best opportunities to improve presented themselves and because I believe that it is better to dominate on one side of the ball than to just be above average on both sides of the ball.
44Deezel 07-25-2009, 01:39 PM Does anyone think that the Skins focused too much on improving the defense and not enough on improving the offense during the off-season?
We added AH, signed Hall to a long-term deal, drafted Orakpo, Barnes, and Jarmon, plus we added a few more defensive players, as well.
Personally, I don't have a problem with it because I happen to know that if the other teams can't score on us then they can't beat us. It sticks in my mind that the Ravens won a Super Bowl with what was, at best, a mediocre offense - but they also had a great defense. I think our defense has a chance to dominate this season and, if they do, we could go a long way in the playoffs.
I suppose that the big questions gnawing at most of us concern the offensive side of the ball. For example, I wonder if we should have gone after a top OT in the off-season.
Yet, I'm content with loading up on defense because that's where the best opportunities to improve presented themselves and because I believe that it is better to dominate on one side of the ball than to just be above average on both sides of the ball.
If the defense gets sacks and turnovers, which it should, it will only help put points on the board. I think we'll see this unit take a few to the house as well. The offense doesn't need to be elite. It just needs to be effective. Cut down on the 3 and outs, keep turnovers to a minimum, win the time of possession battle, score in the red zone and don't hurt the defense by keeping them on the field all day. Do that and the Skins could be elite.
But that said, I do think they could have upgraded the offensive line. I would say they should have addressed the WR position, but they did last year with Kelly, Thomas and Davis. If none of them step-up, then shame on the FO for drafting poorly. Can't say they didn't try though. Like I said in another post, we have pro-bowl caliber players at WR, RB, FB, LT and TE. That should be enough to produce 20+ points per game. It's all on Zorn and Campbell.
CRedskinsRule 07-25-2009, 01:44 PM Does anyone think that the Skins focused too much on improving the defense and not enough on improving the offense during the off-season?
We added AH, signed Hall to a long-term deal, drafted Orakpo, Barnes, and Jarmon, plus we added a few more defensive players, as well.
Personally, I don't have a problem with it because I happen to know that if the other teams can't score on us then they can't beat us. It sticks in my mind that the Ravens won a Super Bowl with what was, at best, a mediocre offense - but they also had a great defense. I think our defense has a chance to dominate this season and, if they do, we could go a long way in the playoffs.
I suppose that the big questions gnawing at most of us concern the offensive side of the ball. For example, I wonder if we should have gone after a top OT in the off-season.
Yet, I'm content with loading up on defense because that's where the best opportunities to improve presented themselves and because I believe that it is better to dominate on one side of the ball than to just be above average on both sides of the ball.
I agree with this paragraph, and feel they are justifiably counting on the second year production from this offense. I think we all agree we would have like a little more focus on the OLine, but overall I am content with this offseason.
wilsowilso 07-25-2009, 01:59 PM For example, I wonder if we should have gone after a top OT in the off-season.
I think we made the right call because there are only a handful of top Offensive Tackles that have more of an impact on the game than AH does and none of them was available.
We grabbed the best player on the market probably by a large margin.
53Fan 07-25-2009, 02:07 PM I think the expectations are for the offense to be better this year with who we had. The lack of turnovers, sacks, and points scored by the defense became a big concern and needed to be addressed. We did pick up some o-linemen as FA's so that helps.
SBXVII 07-25-2009, 03:28 PM With out reading.....Defense wins Championships.
If we can get turn overs then we are set. Then get like 2 TD's extra per game then we will win most of our games.
Lotus 07-25-2009, 03:36 PM We strengthened our strong suit to make it dominant. That is a reasonable strategy.
It would have been nice to upgrade at OT, etc., too. But we had many holes not long ago and now (hopefully) we've plugged some of them. It was a good strategy, for many reasons, to plug defensive holes first.
Building through the draft requires patience. Maybe next year at this time we'll be talking about awesome new additions to the OL.
Beemnseven 07-25-2009, 06:20 PM With out reading.....Defense wins Championships.
If we can get turn overs then we are set. Then get like 2 TD's extra per game then we will win most of our games.
Then what happened in '04 with Joe Gibbs at the helm? We were 6-10, but we had the #3 overall defense in the league?
That's one of the biggest myths in football. You still have to score.
SBXVII 07-25-2009, 08:23 PM Then what happened in '04 with Joe Gibbs at the helm? We were 6-10, but we had the #3 overall defense in the league?
That's one of the biggest myths in football. You still have to score.
What happened is what's happened for the last like 10 yrs......no offense. We need to score atleast 21points per game or more. The most we have been doing through Gibbs until now has been in the teens. We came close last yr, a couple of times we made into the twenties.
The way I see it if we can score 2 more TD's per game then we should be winning a few more games that were close last yr.
Zerohero 07-25-2009, 08:25 PM With out reading.....Defense wins Championships.
If we can get turn overs then we are set. Then get like 2 TD's extra per game then we will win most of our games.
What he said
|