Obama Care

How else I'm I suppose to answer a silly question? You're still the champ man, you still have the biggest in the block...I'm not worthy :headbange

I'll grab a beer with you any time but I don't know about pulling chairs out from under old ladies. I would much rather hit on waitresses and trash TTL.

I'm not clear how asking you to clarify the things you post is silly. Can you explain? The less intelligent on this site, like myself clearly, might learn something.

I'm not clear how asking you to clarify the things you post is silly. Can you explain? The less intelligent on this site, like myself clearly, might learn something.

Your postulation is f'ed up therefore your question is silly. Calling someone inexpert does not imply that you're an expert. This shouldn't require explanation. Furthermore, you took an extra step off of a cliff by asking me if I think I'm smarter than everyone else on the site. I answered your question right the first time, even better the second time but you still want to continue your silliness.

I hope you learned something from this exchange.

Once again a liberal makes a statement then refuses to answer the question.


Look, you said they're stealing your money via SS and not going to jail. If you can infer that the government is stealing your money I can by the same token infer that the guys running my mutual funds are stealing my money. Lord knows my portfolio is down the shiiter.

How else I'm I suppose to answer a silly question? You're still the champ man, you still have the biggest in the block...I'm not worthy :headbange

I'll grab a beer with you any time but I don't know about pulling chairs out from under old ladies. I would much rather hit on waitresses and trash TTL.

Trash who? Don't let your fiancee see you flirting with the waitresses. You can try, but you can't make chicken salad out of chicken s**t, and I'm not the only one who sees through your little BS. I could care less, I just got my Dallas at Washington ticket reservations today. :woot:

Look, you said they're stealing your money via SS and not going to jail. If you can infer that the government is stealing your money I can by the same token infer that the guys running my mutual funds are stealing my money. Lord knows my portfolio is down the shiiter.
The difference is that your portfolio is in the shitter because the investments are down (they will come back) but your money was put into the funds. With SS the money has been diverted to other things beside SS thus the goverment took my money for one thing but spent it on something else. Thus they stole my money.

Your postulation is f'ed up therefore your question is silly. Calling someone inexpert does not imply that you're an expert. This shouldn't require explanation. Furthermore, you took an extra step off of a cliff by asking me if I think I'm smarter than everyone else on the site. I answered your question right the first time, even better the second time but you still want to continue your silliness.

I hope you learned something from this exchange.

Ok, so if one is not an expert then by obvious logic one must be "inexpert". Correct?

If that is indeed the case your initial use of "inexpert" is odd. It seemed to be meant to describe those of opposing views. Sort of a derogatory jab if you will. Is that what you meant?

You've since made posts which seem to hedge on your own perceived expertness. So are you "inexpert" on the related discussion? If so did you inadvertently take a crack at yourself?

Maybe my perception of your use of "inexpert" is fouled up.

Is this the post you considered the right answer the "first time"?
You're a free man, you can infer whatever you want.

Ok, so if one is not an expert then by obvious logic one must be "inexpert". Correct?

If that is indeed the case your initial use of "inexpert" is odd. It seemed to be meant to describe those of opposing views. Sort of a derogatory jab if you will. Is that what you meant?

You've since made posts which seem to hedge on your own perceived expertness. So are you "inexpert" on the related discussion? If so did you inadvertently take a crack at yourself?

Maybe my perception of your use of "inexpert" is fouled up.

Is this the post you considered the right answer the "first time"?

You are incorrect.
a) Definition of an expert is "a person with a high degree of skill in or knowledge of a certain subject."
b) There are degrees of expertise, there's also diversity in expertise in particular field or subject matter.
c) You can be an expert and yet be an inexpert next to someone with more expertise.

In conclusion "it's easy to trap the inexpert." This is not about opposing views but merely knowing what you're talking about before entering the public square.

My first answer was perfectly reasonable answer to the question "insinuating that you are the expert right?"

My first answer was perfectly reasonable answer to the question "insinuating that you are the expert right?"

Certainly not. It may have been a reasonable response but an answer to a pointed question it was not. It provided no explanation whatsoever. But now we're quibbling.

Attention Please. Note that I am no longer the biggest asshole on this site, because no post has ever been assholier than this.

I'm impressed, saden. You and me should grab a beer sometime and pull chairs out from under old ladies when they're trying to sit down.

Point well taken.............

I'll bet a 100 bucks that congress will exclude themself from having to take the Obama Care.