Poll: Pick a knucklehead

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Duffman003
06-15-2009, 09:24 PM
If the Redskins had to pick up one of the available knuckleheads between the three (no cop out option of 'none of the above') which one would you want the Redskins to get?

no cop outs huh? I choose all three then and get fred smoot to get his party boat together

DBUCHANON101
06-15-2009, 09:25 PM
I didnt mean that post as i would want Vick, just that he was stupid for risking all that he had for so dumb sh** and got caught. now its all gone.

GTripp0012
06-15-2009, 10:43 PM
Burress. As far as knuckleheads go, he's the least likely to do something stupid to hurt his team. Though most of that's a product of age. At Marshall's age, he was pretty crazy dumb.

John Denny
06-15-2009, 11:31 PM
Plaxico's nickname should've been Chedder Bob but it was good nonetheless.

My vote is Brandon Marshall. The man is built like David Boston before he got too big and started to suck. Who can cover that kind of size and strength? I'd give up next year's first round pick for him.

Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor
06-16-2009, 01:25 AM
We need a receiver of Marshall's caliber to command a double team everytime where our 2nd year receivers can operate on single coverage and open up the running game.

Pocket$ $traight
06-16-2009, 01:36 AM
Jeez, this is tough. I think you would go with Marshall since, at the moment, he can step on the field (Plaxico has a couple of legal hurdles and needs the commissioner's blessing). As far as who is tougher to cover, that is a tough call. When Plax is focused, there is no one in the NFL who can cover him. I am just glad that he is out of New York. He abuses us every year.

However, this isn't an ideal situation. They are both complete idiots. I didn't mention Vick because our coaching staff doesn't seem like they want to expand the playbook to the point where Vick could actually help us.

djnemo65
06-16-2009, 03:35 AM
Marshall. You can make an argument for him being the best WR in football, or at least the guy who now has the most upside. He definitely is a moron though. Any team that trades for him will have to ban McDonalds bags, because he might slip on one and fall through a plate glass window or something.

MTK
06-16-2009, 09:11 AM
Talking from a pure talent perspective I would take Marshall.

freddyg12
06-16-2009, 09:28 AM
I can't believe so many people actually picked Plax over Marshall. IMO, Marshall is simply a far better player. They both have had their off field issues.

Plus Marshall is young & on the cusp of, as someone said, maybe being the best in the nfl. Dude runs w/the ball far better than Plax & is consistent game to game.

WE have a trade history w/Denver. I'm not saying we should try & get him, but watch out for Danny!

CRedskinsRule
06-16-2009, 09:40 AM
I can't believe so many people actually picked Plax over Marshall. IMO, Marshall is simply a far better player. They both have had their off field issues.

Plus Marshall is young & on the cusp of, as someone said, maybe being the best in the nfl. Dude runs w/the ball far better than Plax & is consistent game to game.

WE have a trade history w/Denver. I'm not saying we should try & get him, but watch out for Danny!

Kinda piggy backing on this thread, but, what would everyone be willing to give up in trade for Marshall?
Denver would certainly want a high price tag to pull the trigger on any deal. And could we afford him?(silly question the way the FO massages the cap, but he would still be high priced I would think)

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum