The Vick Factor

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26

MTK
05-28-2009, 08:44 AM
Ill get slammed for this but id rather see Colt start than see us get MV. Colt if anything is a better passer. May not be as strong but is very accurate and in the WCO you dont really need a cannon.

If it was between Colt or Vick, I'd take Colt too.

johno
05-28-2009, 09:10 AM
lets hope it never comes to it, but colt>vick

SBXVII
05-28-2009, 09:17 AM
If it was between Colt or Vick, I'd take Colt too.

I totally agree, but if it was between Collins and MV I'd take MV.

MTK
05-28-2009, 09:30 AM
I'd take Collins over Vick easily.

Monksdown
05-28-2009, 10:25 AM
I'd take Mark Brunell today, over Mike Vick 3 years ago. Seriously guys, pretend like you have a little class atleast.

rbanerjee23
05-28-2009, 10:52 AM
WOW...I'm amazed that as many as 32% of people actually want Vick on the Redskins

Monksdown
05-28-2009, 11:07 AM
It's the Tech factor multiplied by what i like to call the Dan Snyder effect.

KLHJ2
05-28-2009, 11:18 AM
I said yes, but not as a QB. I like him as a slash type player. Get him about 3 to 7 touches a game at various positions and let the points soar.

53Fan
05-28-2009, 11:23 AM
Ill get slammed for this but id rather see Colt start than see us get MV. Colt if anything is a better passer. May not be as strong but is very accurate and in the WCO you dont really need a cannon.

You'll get no argument from me. I agree.

Slingin Sammy 33
05-28-2009, 12:30 PM
Ill get slammed for this but id rather see Colt start than see us get MV. Colt if anything is a better passer. May not be as strong but is very accurate and in the WCO you dont really need a cannon.You're right on. I'd rather see any of the QBs on our roster under C before Vick....and that includes Chase Daniel. Hell, I'd suit up Zorn before Vick.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum