Ill get slammed for this but id rather see Colt start than see us get MV. Colt if anything is a better passer. May not be as strong but is very accurate and in the WCO you dont really need a cannon.
If it was between Colt or Vick, I'd take Colt too.
johno
05-28-2009, 09:10 AM
lets hope it never comes to it, but colt>vick
SBXVII
05-28-2009, 09:17 AM
If it was between Colt or Vick, I'd take Colt too.
I totally agree, but if it was between Collins and MV I'd take MV.
I'd take Collins over Vick easily.
Monksdown
05-28-2009, 10:25 AM
I'd take Mark Brunell today, over Mike Vick 3 years ago. Seriously guys, pretend like you have a little class atleast.
rbanerjee23
05-28-2009, 10:52 AM
WOW...I'm amazed that as many as 32% of people actually want Vick on the Redskins
Monksdown
05-28-2009, 11:07 AM
It's the Tech factor multiplied by what i like to call the Dan Snyder effect.
KLHJ2
05-28-2009, 11:18 AM
I said yes, but not as a QB. I like him as a slash type player. Get him about 3 to 7 touches a game at various positions and let the points soar.
53Fan
05-28-2009, 11:23 AM
Ill get slammed for this but id rather see Colt start than see us get MV. Colt if anything is a better passer. May not be as strong but is very accurate and in the WCO you dont really need a cannon.
You'll get no argument from me. I agree.
Slingin Sammy 33
05-28-2009, 12:30 PM
Ill get slammed for this but id rather see Colt start than see us get MV. Colt if anything is a better passer. May not be as strong but is very accurate and in the WCO you dont really need a cannon.You're right on. I'd rather see any of the QBs on our roster under C before Vick....and that includes Chase Daniel. Hell, I'd suit up Zorn before Vick.