|
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
[ 7]
8
The Goat 05-07-2009, 03:58 PM I hate the fact we're even talking about Jansen as the starter. Seriously, our long-suffering, overly loyal coaching staff has said the guy isn't starting material anymore (right after the season ended if I remember correctly).
The lineup should be Samuels, Dock, Rabach, Thomas, Jones
w/ backups Heyer, Bridges, Jansen, Rinehart, Williams.
Pocket$ $traight 05-07-2009, 04:07 PM I hate the fact we're even talking about Jansen as the starter. Seriously, our long-suffering, overly loyal coaching staff has said the guy isn't starting material anymore (right after the season ended if I remember correctly).
The lineup should be Samuels, Dock, Rabach, Thomas, Jones
w/ backups Heyer, Bridges, Jansen, Rinehart, Williams.
If the coaches considered Jansen the starter they wouldn't be have Williams in camp and Jansen wouldn't be taking snaps at guard and center
The Goat 05-07-2009, 04:10 PM If the coaches considered Jansen the starter they wouldn't be have Williams in camp and Jansen wouldn't be taking snaps at guard and center
I hear you man, what I meant is folks around here talking about a Jansen comeback as starter...i guess it's cool to hope for the best but IMO there's a bigger picture.
Pocket$ $traight 05-07-2009, 04:13 PM I hear you man, what I meant is folks around here talking about a Jansen comeback as starter...i guess it's cool to hope for the best but IMO there's a bigger picture.
I gotcha. If he wins that job outright it would be a miracle.
cobracai1 05-07-2009, 04:54 PM Jim Zorn on Jansen: "Well, Jon's been great, because Jon's worked at right tackle, he's worked at guard, and he's helping us at center. And to be honest with you, he's doing a great job at center, communicating with the guards and getting people in the right place. You know, center's a very communicative position, and he's doing a great job with that. The quarterbacks like him because his butt's so tall, they can just stand up and look at things. They don't have to squat down."
I think Zorn saying this more likely solidifies Jansen NOT being our starting RT this year. Obviously they cant cut him for cap reasons so they are trying to find out if he can be useful in other positions. You don't see them trying Samuels or Dock or even Rabach at other positions. At best I think Jansen could end up being sixth man of the year (sorry, its NBA playoff time)
Redskins_P 05-07-2009, 04:58 PM According to the Washington Times there's no interest in Jones...
No interest in Jones - Redskins 360 - Washington Times (http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/redskins/2009/may/07/no-interest-in-jones/)
CRedskinsRule 05-07-2009, 05:02 PM According to the Washington Times there's no interest in Jones...
No interest in Jones - Redskins 360 - Washington Times (http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/redskins/2009/may/07/no-interest-in-jones/)
If this had been JLC, I would have been waiting for the press conference anouncing his arrival!!!
53Fan 05-07-2009, 06:47 PM I think Zorn saying this more likely solidifies Jansen NOT being our starting RT this year. Obviously they cant cut him for cap reasons so they are trying to find out if he can be useful in other positions. You don't see them trying Samuels or Dock or even Rabach at other positions. At best I think Jansen could end up being sixth man of the year (sorry, its NBA playoff time)
I agree. I think Jansen is a backup this year but could possibly push Rabach. At least that's the way I read it.
GTripp0012 05-07-2009, 06:55 PM Jones was due to make $3M this year in Cincy. He will not be signing for chump change wherever he goes.
There is something strange going on here. Levi Jones can still play; he is not old and he's not wracked with injuries. He does not have the reputation for being "felonious". So, why are the Bengals - - not a team with a real deep roster - - so anxious to draft his replacement and move him out?
Is there something dark here? Or is this just an example of why the Bengals are the Bengals?Money. In the NFL, the fact that contracts are not guaranteed is secondary to the fact that if you have talent you keep it, usually. The Bengals however, feel that their 3 million could be better spent elsewhere or pocketed. So though Levi Jones has value to his team, the team feels like they can spend .8 million and get the same effect. So he's out.
I think of Levi Jones as the perfect backup LT. Injury prone, but he can come off the bench if Samuels gets hurt, so the fact that he's injury prone doesn't matter. Then, we can go with anyone at RT.
Lotus 05-07-2009, 06:59 PM Money. In the NFL, the fact that contracts are not guaranteed is secondary to the fact that if you have talent you keep it, usually. The Bengals however, feel that their 3 million could be better spent elsewhere or pocketed. So though Levi Jones has value to his team, the team feels like they can spend .8 million and get the same effect. So he's out.
I think of Levi Jones as the perfect backup LT. Injury prone, but he can come off the bench if Samuels gets hurt, so the fact that he's injury prone doesn't matter. Then, we can go with anyone at RT.
What? The Bengals being cheap? Again?
|