redskins1974
04-26-2009, 09:43 AM
We had the 22 ranked offense and the 4th ranked defense and your going to blame the Defense.... too funny. How about games we needed the Offense to step up - we scored 10 points at home against Dallas, 7 points against Pitt, 10 points at home against NY, 7 points opening game at NY, 13 points at home against the pathetic Rams....etc - ALL LOSSES. (scored only 14 points against the browns and only 14 against the eagles but still won thanks to the Defense). come on man, stop already with blaming the D
nyredskinsfan
04-26-2009, 09:49 AM
We had the 22 ranked offense and the 4th ranked defense and your going to blame the Defense.... too funny. How about games we needed the Offense to step up - we scored 10 points at home against Dallas, 7 points against Pitt, 10 points at home against NY, 7 points opening game at NY, 13 points at home against the pathetic Rams....etc - ALL LOSSES. (scored only 14 points against the browns and only 14 against the eagles but still won thanks to the Defense). come on man, stop already with blaming the D
Our Offense was a consistant 3 and out. Be surprised that the Def was able to do as well as they did when they were on the field all that time. Back in the day the Skins Off was known to wear down a D and we took over the 4th qtr. It's the other way around now.
724Skinsfan
04-26-2009, 10:02 AM
Actually, the offense was on the field more than the defense. We were 8th in the NFL in Time of Possession with 31:31. We did do a terrible job of converting 3rd down, though.
redskins1974
04-26-2009, 10:06 AM
and settled for a ton of field goals....
Superman13732
04-26-2009, 10:09 AM
and settled for a ton of field goals....
Eve with a Red Zone threat like Cooley/Sellers.
nyredskinsfan
04-26-2009, 10:12 AM
Actually, the offense was on the field more than the defense. We were 8th in the NFL in Time of Possession with 31:31. We did do a terrible job of converting 3rd down, though.
Thanks for correcting my guess work. Guess it just seemed like they were always back in on 3 and outs.
TheSmurfs22
04-26-2009, 10:44 AM
It is a non-issue now, however the Skins have some work to do in repairing their relationship with JC.
Beemnseven
04-26-2009, 10:55 AM
Eve with a Red Zone threat like Cooley/Sellers.
Then they must not be much of a Red Zone threat.
firstdown
04-26-2009, 11:02 AM
Actually, the offense was on the field more than the defense. We were 8th in the NFL in Time of Possession with 31:31. We did do a terrible job of converting 3rd down, though.
Time of possession means nothing if you cannot convert that into point on the board.
724Skinsfan
04-26-2009, 11:07 AM
Time of possession means nothing if you cannot convert that into point on the board.
It means the offense was on the field longer than the defense which was the whole point of the post.