Trading Players for Draft Picks Game

Ruh - Great thread. I am good with losing Brennan, Smoot, and/or Doughty. I am not as high on Brennan as most. Of course I hope he is effing awesome and takes us to a trillion superbowls down the line, but I am not on board with the Cult of Colt quite yet.

Golston and that is pretty much it. I wouldn't trade Montgomery, he is clearly the better player (don't tell Greg Blache) and Haynesworth is not going to play all the snaps at nose this year. As Tripp said, Alexander should make this team and right now we have three guys who are best suited to the nose and it would be best if we could have Alexander to back up Griff at the "3".

Ruh - Great thread. I am good with losing Brennan, Smoot, and/or Doughty. I am not as high on Brennan as most. Of course I hope he is effing awesome and takes us to a trillion superbowls down the line, but I am not on board with the Cult of Colt quite yet.

You're not going to get anything for Colt worth trading. It's not like he's even worth a 4th at this point. If someone wanted him that badly they would've drafted him before the 6th round last year.

I would trade Betts and ARE as well, but I really don't think we'd be able to get more than a 5th rounder for either of them.

We would need to trade them to a team that's been known to give away 3rds and 4ths for marginal players... I know, we could trade them to ourselves!

Betts and Golston might warrant a 3rd, but beyond that I don't see anyone on our team, that other teams would trade for.

It kinda sounds in the grand scheme of the front office, is the Skins are going to start all over with youth on Offense(Something that was yelled loudly here on this site) but of course the way the FO is doing it, it hurts a lot.

Example:

Get Sanchez, Young WR's last year, Young TE last year

Going with that thinking there are some players who we would be wasting till the youth grows up football wise... like
Clinton Portis 30year old backs go down hill! Clinton is 27 but the Skins ride him hard!
Santana Moss near 30 and not a number 1 reciever!
Betts, ARE and JC are a given. Trade bate material all the way!

I am not saying I agree but some have to watch out what they want cause Vinny and Dan do things how they want!

I know some ppl won't agree with me on this but i would trade Santana OR (not AND) ARE immediately. They both have trade value and we have a stockpile of wide receivers (albeit unspectacular WR's). I think we could definitely find suitors for either of them. I think the problem is that by having both of them we limit ourselves offensively with the WCO that we are trying to set up. In a way i think it would be addition by subtraction if we can get a day 1 pick out of a deal and draft a starter.

I am also not a big fan of paying Betts to sit on the bench. I think he is both very tradeable and expendable. If we can get a 4th rounder and a later pick for him, i'd be all for it. We can use that 4th rounder to draft an immediate need (LB, DE, OL) and the later pick to draft a backup RB to replace him.

Had to add that I love the thread, btw...

I really wouldn't trade anyone right now outside of Campbell assuming he's involved in a trade up to grab Sanchez.

Rogers and Campbell. Rogers would cost money, but Campbell would save us money. Rogers could probably get a low 2nd or 3rd while Campbell could probably get between a 2nd or 4th. Hard to gauge value.

A good place to start but we may need to keep Carlos one more year so we can worry about the defensive backfield later. If I could get a 2nd rounder for Betts I would do that and package Kareem Moore and Malcom? Kelley for another 2nd rounder.