Broncos to trade Cutler


hooskins
04-02-2009, 03:56 AM
We've basically priced out the entire market because of Dip Shit's stupid hard-on for signings. Who the heck else can afford or is stupid enough to drop so much.. Now the Broncos have a monopolistic market in which to price, as Dip Shit is willing to pay whatever for his fix. I swear if we get rid of Cooley I will not be a fan anymore.

I guess eventually this won't matter when the salary cap expires and Dip Shit can make us the Yankees of the NFL.

djnemo65
04-02-2009, 04:00 AM
I see posts talking about Campbell being good, but not good enough to take us all the way to the Superbowl. Superbowl? Shouldn't we try and win a playoff game first?

NM Redskin
04-02-2009, 04:04 AM
We've basically priced out the entire market because of Dip Shit's stupid hard-on for signings. Who the heck else can afford or is stupid enough to drop so much.. Now the Broncos have a monopolistic market in which to price, as Dip Shit is willing to pay whatever for his fix. I swear if we get rid of Cooley I will not be a fan anymore.

I guess eventually this won't matter when the salary cap expires and Dip Shit can make us the Yankees of the NFL.

And if we don't get Cutler were screwed cause Campbell is entering a lame duck year with a team who has no faith in him. And its looking like there's no way that Sanchez falls to us at # 13. Bye bye 2009, Hello Colt.

Skinny Tee
04-02-2009, 04:08 AM
I see posts talking about Campbell being good, but not good enough to take us all the way to the Superbowl. Superbowl? Shouldn't we try and win a playoff game first?

True that.

People said that about Marty Schottenheimer. "He can take you to the Conference Championship but he can't win a Super Bowl"...Was that a bad thing?

I'd love to be talked about in the playoffs while 2/3rds of the teams sat at home and watched you play. We've won more high profile free agent contracts in the last 5 years than playoff games.

redskins5044
04-02-2009, 06:37 AM
i am so sick of this team, give up draft picks for another teams player. Cutler hasnt won any thing yet in this league and too give up 2 1st round picks is insane. Now with all these rumors going around about the skins persuing Cutler, makes our situation dicey if we dont get him. I am sick of the way our FO does business

CRedskinsRule
04-02-2009, 07:48 AM
If this goes down my long standing position in general support of the Dan will be extremely shaken. This is simply not a smart move in my opinion. I fail to see a reasonable way this goes down from this point that makes our team better. I am pretty disappointed right now.

This is EXACTLY how I feel. Well said!

irish
04-02-2009, 08:05 AM
I see posts talking about Campbell being good, but not good enough to take us all the way to the Superbowl. Superbowl? Shouldn't we try and win a playoff game first?

Good point. Unfortunately the Skins are closer to the Bengals than the Steelers. I dont see JC even taking the Skins to the playoffs. I think Cutler for JC is an obvious upgrade at QB and dont really have a problem with the Skins making this move but I'd prefer to see the Skins hold on to their picks. Denver's problem wasnt O last year and I cant imagine that Cutler can do a lot to get the Skins O moving.

SC Skins Fan
04-02-2009, 08:14 AM
Good point. Unfortunately the Skins are closer to the Bengals than the Steelers. I dont see JC even taking the Skins to the playoffs. I think Cutler for JC is an obvious upgrade at QB and dont really have a problem with the Skins making this move but I'd prefer to see the Skins hold on to their picks. Denver's problem wasnt O last year and I cant imagine that Cutler can do a lot to get the Skins O moving.

Yeah, Cutler for Campbell would be an upgrade, but that is not a Redskins trade. The Redskins have overpaid in every trade they have made in the DS era and if they make a move for Cutler they will give up a king's ransom. It will be a package of picks, maybe some young players, something that makes no sense and hurts the team in the long term. That is the Skins formula for trades. And the Broncos have benefited more than most. The only decent trade they have made was the one with Atlanta during the draft last year. Your "I don't even see JC taking the Skins to the playoffs" is a patently ridiculous statement btw.

irish
04-02-2009, 08:28 AM
Yeah, Cutler for Campbell would be an upgrade, but that is not a Redskins trade. The Redskins have overpaid in every trade they have made in the DS era and if they make a move for Cutler they will give up a king's ransom. It will be a package of picks, maybe some young players, something that makes no sense and hurts the team in the long term. That is the Skins formula for trades. And the Broncos have benefited more than most. The only decent trade they have made was the one with Atlanta during the draft last year. Your "I don't even see JC taking the Skins to the playoffs" is a patently ridiculous statement btw.

JC hasent really done anything to show me that he could lead the team to the playoffs but anything can happen.

The Skins also gave up a ton to get Campbell and like you said, its how the skins do business. I have really stopped caring how the Skins do business all I am looking for is a team that can win now so if Cutler can do that then bring him on.

The Skins have become an organization that is sucking the life out of its fans. They dont seem to have a plan and most things they do seem to turn to crap.

SOUL-SKINS
04-02-2009, 08:33 AM
I originally wanted Cutler but not for 2 first rounders. Thats absured.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum