Broncos to trade CutlerPages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
[36]
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
70Chip 04-02-2009, 01:12 AM What's upsetting people the most about this alleged deal? Is it losing draft picks potentially? Is it just the idea of change again? It's the idea that Snyder can't let someone else run the show. He get's bored and amuses himself with this sort of shit. The Goat 04-02-2009, 01:12 AM What's upsetting people the most about this alleged deal? Is it losing draft picks potentially? Is it just the idea of change again? Yep... BigHairedAristocrat 04-02-2009, 01:12 AM What's upsetting people the most about this alleged deal? Is it losing draft picks potentially? Is it just the idea of change again? For me, its Cutlers alleged alcohol abuse. A diabetic has no business drinking alcohol AT ALL, let alone in the amounts Cutler is reported of as drinking. It also shows a pattern of self-destructive behavior. Cutler is too risky of a move. That said, if we did trade a plethora of picks for Cutler, the Skins could make up for it by trading Campbell to Chicago for Briggs, straight up... oh wait, thats impossible, nevermind. Skinny Tee 04-02-2009, 01:13 AM What's upsetting people the most about this alleged deal? Is it losing draft picks potentially? Is it just the idea of change again? No OL help in the draft and the loss of stability. Stability is something that Joe Gibbs put a lot of effort into when he came here. I don't want us go back to major wholesale personnel changes on a yearly basis because no one has the balls to stand up to Dan's wonderlust. GMScud 04-02-2009, 01:14 AM What's upsetting people the most about this alleged deal? Is it losing draft picks potentially? Is it just the idea of change again? I won't cry a river if JC leaves. For me it's what we'd have to give up. We need starting caliber talent at tackle and OLB right now. Like yesterday. Giving up our top pick(s) craps on our chances at a guy like Oher, who we can agree we'd both love in B&G. I don't know what Cutler would do to our '09 cap, but it I'm sure it would hinder our ability for more FA O-lineman or OLBs to go with the picks we'd have to shed to pick him up. Ruhskins 04-02-2009, 01:14 AM Well, as I understand it, if Campbell does end up in Denver it won't be because they wanted him but because we forced him on them What the Redskins are reportedly proposing is not earth shattering though. Which is...??? BG9721 04-02-2009, 01:16 AM Lets Take Cutler, I love Campbell (great guy) but hes not a franchise QB. Hes a solid good quarterback that i hope has a great career. But his contract is ending and id much rather go with a kid who has some growing up to do but can carry this team for years to come. If we have the right veteran leadership and core guys (which i think we do)they can groom cutler into the elway we didnt get BigHairedAristocrat 04-02-2009, 01:17 AM Which is...??? thats what im wondering. i havent heard any semi-verifiable reports of what were offering. tryfuhl 04-02-2009, 01:17 AM Well, as I understand it, if Campbell does end up in Denver it won't be because they wanted him but because we forced him on them What the Redskins are reportedly proposing is not earth shattering though. you're so vaaaague NM Redskin 04-02-2009, 01:17 AM What the Redskins are reportedly proposing is not earth shattering though. So what the word on what were offering? JC and the 13th? I wouldn't mind JC and Betts for Cutler. | |
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum