Zorn says no on Cutler, talks Haynesworth, Hall and '09 hopes

Don't worry I'm known for having a quick release

:laughing2 I'm not gonna say a word.

Don't worry I'm known for having a quick release

That's what she said.

that's what she said.
zing!

No, we can't kill the Cutler talk now. A head coach lying about interest in a player -- UNPOSSIBLE. The NFL is full of smoke screens. If our FO got a decent chance at Cutler, I bet they'd make the move in a heart beat. Also, read his comments closely, no where did he say we wouldn't be interested in Cutler. He said we're not 'asking' about him.

I think the chances of us getting Cutler are slim -- but I don't think we're out of the picture by any stretch of the imagination.

I wouldn't blame you for doubting Redskins FO, but if you are right; we trade for Cutler with our picks (obviously we won't trade JC due to Zorn's comments).. Cutler then would be riding bench as #2 QB because Zorn basically said that JC is our starter..

What team would acknowledge interest in another QB knowing that if the trade doesn't pan out they would create a QB drama situation with thier current starter? We all know the chances of Cutler being traded anywhere are low let alone to DC...but to think that the skins are not interested just because Zorn or Vinny say so is gullable and laughable. The fact alone that the redskins have not made any contract offer to JC means that they are not completely sold on him long term so if that's the case wouldn't it be reasonable to think that they would at least look into what it would take to land Cutler? The skins may very well not be interested in Cutler, but my point is that they would deny interest regardless.

Cutler's going to the Jets (not the Redskins) on draft day. BANK ON IT!!

I wouldn't blame you for doubting Redskins FO, but if you are right; we trade for Cutler with our picks (obviously we won't trade JC due to Zorn's comments).. Cutler then would be riding bench as #2 QB because Zorn basically said that JC is our starter..

I am sure Zorn meant JC is the starter over the other QB's currently on the roster. And besides if the unlikely Cutler trade took place then Campbell would either be traded as part of that deal or he would be shipped somewhere else in a seperate trade for a draft pick. They would never acquire Cutler to ride the bench and they would never ask Campbell to stay and ride the bench behind Cutler.

We weren't going to get Jason Taylor or Albert Haynesworth either.

But in all honesty, we're not getting Cutler.

Don't worry I'm known for having a quick release

My condolences to your woman :p

I am sure Zorn meant JC is the starter over the other QB's currently on the roster. And besides if the unlikely Cutler trade took place then Campbell would either be traded as part of that deal or he would be shipped somewhere else in a seperate trade for a draft pick. They would never acquire Cutler to ride the bench and they would never ask Campbell to stay and ride the bench behind Cutler.

Zorn might meant that way, but I doubt it..

That's exactly what I'm trying to say.. I find it hard to believe that Redskins are willing to waste our picks, especially when we have pressing needs to fill in positions such as RT, DE and LB..